Better Late Than Never
Mar 26th, 2006 at 8:47 pm by Susie
Now that it’s safe to come out, the New York Times is running to the front of the parade:
The New York Times is planning an article on a secret memo from January 2003 that “sheds light on the buildup and decision-making process before the invasion of Iraq,” RAW STORY has learned.
The article, written by Don Van Natta Jr., most likely addresses the Jan. 31, 2003 memorandum which was leaked to a British author and referenced in February of this year. It is unknown whether or not The New York Times was able to obtain a copy of the secret memo, and it remains possible that the Times has acquired a different memo.
According to an article on the memo published by the Guardian in February, “Mr Bush made it clear the US intended to invade whether or not there was a second UN resolution and even if UN inspectors found no evidence of a banned Iraqi weapons programme.”
Yeah - why not?
Here’s how the whore times tries to gain a shred of integrity - by telling us what we already know and pretending it’s “news”
Of course, they will be shitsure not to implicate themselves and their role in whoring for the warmeisters.
That’s so obscenely unpatriotic of them. All Bush was trying to do was to protect us from nuculear terrists after 9/11, when the world became a different and more dangerous place.