Suburban Guerrilla

Sep 20th, 2006 at 12:30 pm by Susie

This sure is interesting.

Posted in Uncategorized

9 Responses to “I’m Not A Conspiracy Theorist, But…”

on 20 Sep 2006 at 1:43 pm1Izquierdo

Just looking at the WFC footage, it’s obvious
that the collapse was a controlled demolition.
It’s interesting to hear Bushco confirm that,
advertently or inadvertently.
on 20 Sep 2006 at 7:23 pm2Phillybits

Thanks for the linkage through Brendan, Susie. I put up a short little video kind of making the same points as the posts of mine that Brendan covered.
on 21 Sep 2006 at 1:34 am3Izquierdo

WFC should be WTC.
Sorry.
One is across the street from the other.
on 21 Sep 2006 at 7:17 am4zorgrian

Wow, the nasty little double crossing two faced *****, has really slipped up here. I guess that none of us really doubt that the rattlebrained president monkey bush-head has and will probably continue to make ridiculous mistakes. Yet, the ever stern-faced Con-job-lisa,official mouthpiece of the the real string-pullers, the Banksters and the London based Illuminati has in a mortal moment of unconscious humanity, revealed what she really knows to be true. This shows at least, that although she has sold her soul to the corporate devils, she still has a relatively normal human brain lurking in there somewhere.

I was not a conspiracy theorist until the events of 9/11, and it is unfortunate that since that date, more questions seem to have been answered by a conspiratorial viewpoint than from any other. Not that I was ever a staunch believer in the Government position on anything in particular, but I usually drew the line at conspiracy theory.

Like many, since 9/11, I have embarked upon a mental journey of research and questioning. For me this is a one way ticket. Over the last few years my understanding of who really runs the world has been sharpened to a new understanding. This new understanding requires you to equip yourself with a set of completely new mental constructs. The shear scale of the Big Lie is staggering and if that is not enough to take on board, it seems that it has been going on for a very long time. The ancestors of today’s scheming manipulators were instrumental in founding America. America, Canada and most of South America are in fact part of a European Masonic conspiracy. This conspiracy is called ‘The Colombian Conspiracy’ and it is the birth place of The New World Order. But don’t take my word for it. Continue to question everything and everything. And if this seems to change your world view with such staggering profundity that almost nothing is left unturned: good, it means there is hope!

Pieces of footage like this can do as much damage to The New World order as they do with their evil depleted uranium bullets to the sacrificial undefended peoples of Afghanistan and Iraq. I believe that there is a very strong hope that one way or another, enough people will wake up from the boring dumb show dream that they have been feeding us with for years.

Once woken up, you are left stranded and divorced from the old world view, but that’s no real loss since it was a pack of lies anyway. It is now obvious that our democracies are nothing but a total lie. We see now that the Carlyle Group, the Bilderberg group and the International Banksters are the real government. These people are businessmen. They are masters of deception who have ratcheted up their scale of operations to achieve their form of world Government as soon as they can.

I was so outraged about this that I started a wiki style website called http://www.wikispiracy.org

Anyone is free to publish conspiracy related articles on this site
on 21 Sep 2006 at 11:05 am5ME

Uh, The WTC WAS bombed… in 92′

And Bush’s statement didn’t even make sense under any parsing. How does “setting the explosives high enough” ensure that people got stuck on upper floors? Shouldn’t it be setting the explosives LOW enough?

This is a “fun” video… but not really an indication or proof of ANYTHING.
on 21 Sep 2006 at 12:50 pm6MH

ME is right; I’m certain the reference was to the 1992 WTC bombing.

Moreover, while there’s no question that the administration is “careful” about what it say in this regard, that doesn’t mean that it’s artful, or grammatical, or even intelligent about what it says. In any case, the president barely speaks English; rasacking his unscripted statements for reason or good sense is just a waste of time.

Finally, if there was a government sponsored conspiracy to destroy the WTC and blame Al-Quaeda, the president would be the last person to be told; I’m pretty certain that on of the basic rules of sucessful conspiring is to not let idiots about the conspiracy, since they’ll blab.
on 21 Sep 2006 at 2:10 pm7Phillybits

I’m aware the WTC was bombed previously, but if you either read the transcript or watch the entire interview, it’s clear Condi wasn’t talking about the first attack. They (Matt and Condi) were talking about the GWOT at the very point when she made her comment.

Also, Bush’s comments on explosives were gathered, according to him, from interrogation of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. The intel he provided was regarding the 9/11 attacks. Least, that’s what it sounded like to me. Go read the transcript.

Look, I’m not going to jump right into the fray and say “Look! They did it! Arrest them! It’s a grand conspiracy.” I’m simply entertaining the idea that there are a growing segment of people who don’t believe what the government is telling them.

And when statements like those are made, it would help to either - clarify them, or reiterate. There are people who, if they watch a report on FOX that buying Twinkies funds international terrorism against the US, they will immedietly stop buying Twinkies and issue a fatwa against Hostess.

That’s just a fact. People trust, without hesitation or any display of doubt, what is fed to them in the media. And it covers both the left and the right.

So when someone hears the President say something about explosives used on the WTC on 9/11, and then hear Condi Rice say it roughly the same again, if they’re even slightly hesitant to trust what they hear, and then they hear that, well….you know how it goes.

Fatwas against Hostess.

Personally, I could find out tomorrow that it was all a grand conspiracy. Will I care? Ehh. Yes, but probably not enough to overcome the burning desire that what I really want is just to get him out of office. He’s done enough damage already.
on 21 Sep 2006 at 3:23 pm8Ed Drone

Not to defend the indefensible, but “bombed” isn’t all that wrong in this case, since the whole thrust of the warnings they ignored was that terrorists might well use jetliners as “bombs.”

So, yes, the towers were bombed. And the demolition was not a “controlled fall” those specialty companies are so famous for. For one thing, setting the charges is a time-consuming task, and for them to have been set after the planes hit would have been impossible. For it to have been done beforehand is also very, very unlikely. There were too many people in those buildings, day and night, for it to have been done surreptitiously.

Sorry, it won’t hold water, this theory.

Ed
on 22 Sep 2006 at 7:39 am9Phillybits

I don’t doubt that planting charges in the WTC would have been a very difficult thing to do, what with people constantly being in the building, as well as security, etc.

The “theory” I present, is not really a theory. More an analysis of what people say and the effect it has on people.

Like I said, if it came out tomorrow that it was true, I’d probably shrug because honestly, with litigation, evidence gathering, etc, by the time this rolled into court, it’d be far beyond Bush’s presidency but furthermore, like MH said,

Finally, if there was a government sponsored conspiracy to destroy the WTC and blame Al-Quaeda, the president would be the last person to be told; Iâ€™m pretty certain that one of the basic rules of sucessful conspiring is to not let idiots [know] about the conspiracy, since theyâ€™ll blab.

Trackback URI |

I’m Not A Conspiracy Theorist, But…

9 Responses to “I’m Not A Conspiracy Theorist, But…”

My Liberal Identity:

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories

Tags

Pages