<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail Call</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 06:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CruzBustamove</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123448</link>
		<dc:creator>CruzBustamove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123448</guid>
		<description>Better leave my Publisher's Clearing House shit alone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better leave my Publisher&#8217;s Clearing House shit alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goalkeeper</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123396</link>
		<dc:creator>goalkeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123396</guid>
		<description>This is where the Libertarians hit the skids and reveal that they are nothing less than the neo-cons they say they abhor.

To think that they will do anything other than leave skid marks in their tighty whities is to believe that Libertarians have a real philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where the Libertarians hit the skids and reveal that they are nothing less than the neo-cons they say they abhor.</p>
<p>To think that they will do anything other than leave skid marks in their tighty whities is to believe that Libertarians have a real philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izquierdo</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123393</link>
		<dc:creator>Izquierdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123393</guid>
		<description>What meaning can a signing statement have 
if it's signed by an illiterate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What meaning can a signing statement have<br />
if it&#8217;s signed by an illiterate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bladerunner</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123388</link>
		<dc:creator>Bladerunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123388</guid>
		<description>A signing statement is not a bill or  a law or anything. Only if you agree that the President is the law, can you acept a singing statement. If you beleive that, there is no consitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A signing statement is not a bill or  a law or anything. Only if you agree that the President is the law, can you acept a singing statement. If you beleive that, there is no consitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: upyernoz</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123385</link>
		<dc:creator>upyernoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123385</guid>
		<description>one of these days bush will overreach and attach a signing statement saying he has the right to kill and eat the christian baby of his choosing.  man, won't it be embarrassing when that one leaks out.

maybe the boston globe will have a story about it, noting that what the president wrote was technically "contrary to law." then everyone will go their merry way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of these days bush will overreach and attach a signing statement saying he has the right to kill and eat the christian baby of his choosing.  man, won&#8217;t it be embarrassing when that one leaks out.</p>
<p>maybe the boston globe will have a story about it, noting that what the president wrote was technically &#8220;contrary to law.&#8221; then everyone will go their merry way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123384</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/04/11/45/more-tests/#comment-123384</guid>
		<description>What is this spine thing I keep hearing about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this spine thing I keep hearing about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
