<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schumer&#8217;s Going to Be Proven Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: PSoTD</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124166</link>
		<dc:creator>PSoTD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124166</guid>
		<description>Well put.  But you know what?  I think America &lt;b&gt;wants&lt;/b&gt; a politician to say to them - it's only bad choices, here's the least bad choice we see for America and Iraq, no guarantee it won't be problematic either, but we won't fixate on a policy that isn't working, or tell you it's working when it clearly isn't working.

They won't enjoy the news, but they'll appreciate being treated honestly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put.  But you know what?  I think America <b>wants</b> a politician to say to them - it&#8217;s only bad choices, here&#8217;s the least bad choice we see for America and Iraq, no guarantee it won&#8217;t be problematic either, but we won&#8217;t fixate on a policy that isn&#8217;t working, or tell you it&#8217;s working when it clearly isn&#8217;t working.</p>
<p>They won&#8217;t enjoy the news, but they&#8217;ll appreciate being treated honestly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snuzy mandrake</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124165</link>
		<dc:creator>snuzy mandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124165</guid>
		<description>schumer's problem is that he's on this "democrats must put forward a specific platform" thing.  which is fine, even good. it's just that iraq is such a clusterfuck that no one has a clue of what to do with it. we have nothing but bad options, and no politician wants to tell the american people: "yeah a withdrawal will be a disaster for iraq, it's just that it will be less of a disaster than if we stay."

"vote for me, we'll do the least bad option!" is not a slogan schumer wants the party to run on. and so instead he's simply wishing iraq away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>schumer&#8217;s problem is that he&#8217;s on this &#8220;democrats must put forward a specific platform&#8221; thing.  which is fine, even good. it&#8217;s just that iraq is such a clusterfuck that no one has a clue of what to do with it. we have nothing but bad options, and no politician wants to tell the american people: &#8220;yeah a withdrawal will be a disaster for iraq, it&#8217;s just that it will be less of a disaster than if we stay.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;vote for me, we&#8217;ll do the least bad option!&#8221; is not a slogan schumer wants the party to run on. and so instead he&#8217;s simply wishing iraq away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSoTD</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124161</link>
		<dc:creator>PSoTD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124161</guid>
		<description>That doesn't mean he has to write a book promoting a fiction for the entire party to follow.  Besides, he's not up for re-election again until 2010.

Leadership based in reality is what we really need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean he has to write a book promoting a fiction for the entire party to follow.  Besides, he&#8217;s not up for re-election again until 2010.</p>
<p>Leadership based in reality is what we really need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMG</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124160</link>
		<dc:creator>JMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/01/29/09/49/schumers-going-to-be-proven-wrong/#comment-124160</guid>
		<description>The demographic makeup of the great state of New York makes Schumer's silly Pollyanna stance a political necessity. He has too many constituents with deep emotional ties to Middle East policy. Admitting the US has limited leverage in the area would alienate a fair percentage of those voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The demographic makeup of the great state of New York makes Schumer&#8217;s silly Pollyanna stance a political necessity. He has too many constituents with deep emotional ties to Middle East policy. Admitting the US has limited leverage in the area would alienate a fair percentage of those voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
