<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Permanent Republican Minority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Ware</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-126014</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-126014</guid>
		<description>Hey Traveling Guy - isn't Thompson the one who starred in those conspiracy wacko tv programs &lt;i&gt;X-Files&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Dark Skies&lt;/i&gt; a few years ago? You know, the ones about &lt;i&gt;illegal aliens&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Traveling Guy - isn&#8217;t Thompson the one who starred in those conspiracy wacko tv programs <i>X-Files</i> and <i>Dark Skies</i> a few years ago? You know, the ones about <i>illegal aliens</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendancalling</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-126004</link>
		<dc:creator>brendancalling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-126004</guid>
		<description>traveling guy also needs to stop spoofing my name at comment number 7, especially when his spoof has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Nor does it disprove anything I said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>traveling guy also needs to stop spoofing my name at comment number 7, especially when his spoof has nothing to do with the topic at hand.</p>
<p>Nor does it disprove anything I said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-126002</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-126002</guid>
		<description>traveling guy needs to go take Military History 101.  This war was never winnable and if you knew anything about history you could keep yourself away from The Stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>traveling guy needs to go take Military History 101.  This war was never winnable and if you knew anything about history you could keep yourself away from The Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendan</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125996</link>
		<dc:creator>brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125996</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If testifying to Congress means self-incrimination, that says there’s something to be incriminated about.&lt;/i&gt;
+++++++ 
&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Former DNC Financial Chairman Takes Fifth on Congressional Subpoena&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0102/26/bn.03.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If testifying to Congress means self-incrimination, that says there’s something to be incriminated about.</i><br />
+++++++<br />
<i><b>Former DNC Financial Chairman Takes Fifth on Congressional Subpoena</b></i><br />
<a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0102/26/bn.03.html" rel="nofollow">http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0102/26/bn.03.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendan</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125993</link>
		<dc:creator>brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125993</guid>
		<description>"Instead, they were so worried about criticism from the left that they went in with too few troops wanting to leave as small a footprint as possible."

HAHAHAHA.
I didn't realize how &lt;a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19197" rel="nofollow"&gt;Rumsfeld's experiment with light forces&lt;/a&gt; became "appeasing the left that never wanted to go to war in the first place."
Please dude, you're not in stupidville over here.

"the slim control that the liberals have will evaporate."
Uh yeah, whatever. you guys have the war saddled on YOUR necks, and 21 seats in play. the democrats have 5.  &lt;a href="http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312" rel="nofollow"&gt;the country's trending Democratic&lt;/a&gt;.  

You think the war's going to be over in another 1.5 years? you think the GOP blocking the supplemental in the senate, keeping the troops (&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117449018659244175-ObWjW68CDttpJNZbeKN_WSfm5Q8_20080321.html?mod=blogs" rel="nofollow"&gt;that the majority of the county wants to come home&lt;/a&gt;) in Iraq indefinitely is going to redound to the their benefit?
Gimme some of what you're smoking pal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Instead, they were so worried about criticism from the left that they went in with too few troops wanting to leave as small a footprint as possible.&#8221;</p>
<p>HAHAHAHA.<br />
I didn&#8217;t realize how <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19197" rel="nofollow">Rumsfeld&#8217;s experiment with light forces</a> became &#8220;appeasing the left that never wanted to go to war in the first place.&#8221;<br />
Please dude, you&#8217;re not in stupidville over here.</p>
<p>&#8220;the slim control that the liberals have will evaporate.&#8221;<br />
Uh yeah, whatever. you guys have the war saddled on YOUR necks, and 21 seats in play. the democrats have 5.  <a href="http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312" rel="nofollow">the country&#8217;s trending Democratic</a>.  </p>
<p>You think the war&#8217;s going to be over in another 1.5 years? you think the GOP blocking the supplemental in the senate, keeping the troops (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117449018659244175-ObWjW68CDttpJNZbeKN_WSfm5Q8_20080321.html?mod=blogs" rel="nofollow">that the majority of the county wants to come home</a>) in Iraq indefinitely is going to redound to the their benefit?<br />
Gimme some of what you&#8217;re smoking pal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kosfan</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125988</link>
		<dc:creator>kosfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125988</guid>
		<description>The real problem with the Republican Party is that their priorities are more about serving themselves or their friends instead of the American people.  They focus more on the failed war in Iraq instead of the issues Americans face everyday (education, health care, jobs, crime, environment, etc.).  And their insistence that this country ought to be a "neo-Christian USA" has turned off more people like all of us who read this blog.  

Will the Republicans realize the error of their ways?  Probably when there are only 100 of them in the House and 30 in the Senate.  But until then, they just don't seem to get it, while the Democrats do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real problem with the Republican Party is that their priorities are more about serving themselves or their friends instead of the American people.  They focus more on the failed war in Iraq instead of the issues Americans face everyday (education, health care, jobs, crime, environment, etc.).  And their insistence that this country ought to be a &#8220;neo-Christian USA&#8221; has turned off more people like all of us who read this blog.  </p>
<p>Will the Republicans realize the error of their ways?  Probably when there are only 100 of them in the House and 30 in the Senate.  But until then, they just don&#8217;t seem to get it, while the Democrats do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Traveling Guy</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125987</link>
		<dc:creator>The Traveling Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125987</guid>
		<description>Many Conservatives are unhappy with the Republican party because they didn't deliver. They didn't deliver on winning the war. Instead, they were so worried about criticism from the left that they went in with too few troops wanting to leave as small a footprint as possible. If they fought the war as a real war, instead of allowing Al-Queda leaders to attend a funeral unmolested and instead of allowing arms to be stored in Mosques because they didn't want to offend anyone, they could have been done by now.
Another issue that is a sore spot is Bush's insane policy (or non-policy) concerning illegal immigration. What is that all about?

The Republicans don't have a charismatic leader like Reagan in this race. However, I believe that if Fred Thompson is offered up, you will see the conservatives come out of the woodwork to vote for him and the slim control that the liberals have will evaporate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many Conservatives are unhappy with the Republican party because they didn&#8217;t deliver. They didn&#8217;t deliver on winning the war. Instead, they were so worried about criticism from the left that they went in with too few troops wanting to leave as small a footprint as possible. If they fought the war as a real war, instead of allowing Al-Queda leaders to attend a funeral unmolested and instead of allowing arms to be stored in Mosques because they didn&#8217;t want to offend anyone, they could have been done by now.<br />
Another issue that is a sore spot is Bush&#8217;s insane policy (or non-policy) concerning illegal immigration. What is that all about?</p>
<p>The Republicans don&#8217;t have a charismatic leader like Reagan in this race. However, I believe that if Fred Thompson is offered up, you will see the conservatives come out of the woodwork to vote for him and the slim control that the liberals have will evaporate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jurassicpork</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125985</link>
		<dc:creator>jurassicpork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125985</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the linkie-poo, hun. Always appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the linkie-poo, hun. Always appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swan</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125984</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2007/03/26/14/54/the-permanent-republican-minority/#comment-125984</guid>
		<description>Krugman is awesome.

What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?

It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krugman is awesome.</p>
<p>What explains the failure of the mainstream media to cover the purge scandal for so long, and so many other scandals? Do you think somebody just set up newspaper editors to cheat on their wives, and threatened to tell if the editors wouldn’t play ball when they come back some day and ask for something?</p>
<p>It wouldn’t be that hard to do, when you think about it. People wouldn’t talk about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
