Comments on: Progress ahead http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/ Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:34:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: memyself http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126251 memyself Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:50:22 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126251 John is right I support embryonic stem cell research 100% but this story has nothing to do with that. The Bushies themselves have suggested that use of adult stem cells should take the place of embryonic stem cells. They are likely to use this success as an arguement in their favor. Horray for the progress - but it is not what you seem to think it is ... John is right

I support embryonic stem cell research 100% but this story has nothing to do with that. The Bushies themselves have suggested that use of adult stem cells should take the place of embryonic stem cells. They are likely to use this success as an arguement in their favor.

Horray for the progress - but it is not what you seem to think it is …

]]> By: k http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126246 k Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:50:40 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126246 All I know is that my squeeze has a thing stuck semi-permanently to his side, that he has to disarm to do any number of things. He's lost vision and feeling, in his feet mostly. And I've been awakened by a quivering 250-pound mass of fear and sweat looking for food, now, way more times than I need. This is not something to discuss. All I know is that my squeeze has a thing stuck semi-permanently to his side, that he has to disarm to do any number of things. He’s lost vision and feeling, in his feet mostly. And I’ve been awakened by a quivering 250-pound mass of fear and sweat looking for food, now, way more times than I need.
This is not something to discuss.

]]> By: John http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126245 John Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:20:57 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126245 I have no problem with that research using embryonic stem cells since there are so many. That statement of so many doesn't even take into account any aborted babies, how many fetuses are there just from fertility treatments? My point is that the activist on both sides are so fixated on the embryonic that they totally ignore/discredited any other research. I have no problem with that research using embryonic stem cells since there are so many. That statement of so many doesn’t even take into account any aborted babies, how many fetuses are there just from fertility treatments?

My point is that the activist on both sides are so fixated on the embryonic that they totally ignore/discredited any other research.

]]> By: Dr. S http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126244 Dr. S Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:00 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126244 But what will banning the use of embroyonic stem cells mean for the amount of research that can be done in this area? But what will banning the use of embroyonic stem cells mean for the amount of research that can be done in this area?

]]> By: John http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126243 John Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:28:06 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/04/11/15/14/progress-ahead/#comment-126243 The big thing some object to as I understand it is the use of embrionic stem cells, so since this is using adult stem cells there is no debate. Don't use this success to confuse the debate. For the record I have no problem with any stem cell research since there are plenty of extra embryos. The big thing some object to as I understand it is the use of embrionic stem cells, so since this is using adult stem cells there is no debate. Don’t use this success to confuse the debate. For the record I have no problem with any stem cell research since there are plenty of extra embryos.

]]>