Comments on: Tomorrow http://susiemadrak.com/2007/07/30/18/57/tomorrow-3/ Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media. Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:05:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: k http://susiemadrak.com/2007/07/30/18/57/tomorrow-3/#comment-128300 k Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:47:05 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/07/30/18/57/tomorrow-3/#comment-128300 Interesting comments to the link. Interesting comments to the link.

]]> By: Izquierdo http://susiemadrak.com/2007/07/30/18/57/tomorrow-3/#comment-128291 Izquierdo Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:41:02 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/07/30/18/57/tomorrow-3/#comment-128291 One of the arguments against Pelosi initiating or supporting articles of impeachment is that it would be unseemly, since she would potentially benefit by virtue of being third in the line of succession. Isn't this a bogus reason? Whenever the majority in the house belongs to the other party than the president's, that's always the case, therefore so what? Impeachment almost always has to originate from the opposition party, (how often will a party impeach its own?,) so the argument is foolish and unrealistic. Yes, I realize that the impeachment of Gonzalez is a different matter than the impeachment of Cheney and Bush, but I'm just free-associating and wanted to raise that point. One of the arguments against Pelosi initiating
or supporting articles of impeachment is that it
would be unseemly, since she would potentially
benefit by virtue of being third in the line
of succession.

Isn’t this a bogus reason?
Whenever the majority in the house belongs
to the other party than the president’s,
that’s always the case, therefore so what?
Impeachment almost always has to originate
from the opposition party, (how often will a
party impeach its own?,) so the argument is
foolish and unrealistic.

Yes, I realize that the impeachment of Gonzalez
is a different matter than the impeachment of
Cheney and Bush, but I’m just free-associating
and wanted to raise that point.

]]>