Feeling Safer Yet?
Sep 5th, 2007 at 3:04 pm by Susie
BISMARCK, N.D. - A B-52 bomber was mistakenly loaded with five nuclear warheads during a flight from North Dakota to Louisiana, a newspaper reported Wednesday.
The bomber carried advanced cruise missiles as part of a Defense Department program to retire 400 of the missiles, the Military Times said, quoting three officers who spoke on condition they remain anonymous because they were not authorized to discuss the incident.
The officers said the nuclear warheads should have been removed before the missiles were mounted onto pylons under the bomber’s wings for the Aug. 30 flight from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, the newspaper said Wednesday.
UPDATE from former CIA agent Larry Johnson over at his blog:
Why the hubbub over a B-52 taking off from a B-52 base in Minot, North Dakota and subsequently landing at a B-52 base in Barksdale, Louisiana? That’s like getting excited if you see a postal worker in uniform walking out of a post office. And how does someone watching a B-52 land identify the cruise missiles as nukes? It just does not make sense.
So I called a old friend and retired B-52 pilot and asked him. What he told me offers one compelling case of circumstantial evidence. My buddy, let’s call him Jack D. Ripper, reminded me that the only times you put weapons on a plane is when they are on alert or if you are tasked to move the weapons to a specific site.
Then he told me something I had not heard before.
Barksdale Air Force Base is being used as a jumping off point for Middle East operations. Gee, why would we want cruise missile nukes at Barksdale Air Force Base. Can’t imagine we would need to use them in Iraq. Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?
His final point was to observe that someone on the inside obviously leaked the info that the planes were carrying nukes. A B-52 landing at Barksdale is a non-event. A B-52 landing with nukes. That is something else.
Now maybe there is an innocent explanation for this? I can’t think of one. What is certain is that the pilots of this plane did not just make a last minute decision to strap on some nukes and take them for a joy ride. We need some tough questions and clear answers. What the hell is going on? Did someone at Barksdale try to indirectly warn the American people that the Bush Administration is staging nukes for Iran? I don’t know, but it is a question worth asking.
ANOTHER UPDATE from Larry’s comment section:
I worked on nuclear submarines for the Navy at Mare Island Naval shipyard for 20 years. As a Nuc worker I handled nuclear material and weapons for 15 of those years. The controls on weapons and nuclear fuel is insanely tight.. This story just CAN’T happen. The amount of people involved in logistics..Code 105 radcon, Engineers, Nuclear riggers, Code 1390 Engineers.. Gawd the paperwork involved for anyone of the groups to sign off on.
This story is impossible.. Something else is afoot..
Who signed off and who told them too?
AND WHY do we need to be moving nuclear weapons unless a logistics operation is underway?
IT JUST DOESN’T HAPPEN…They don’t just move weapons from Minot for the hell of it..
And this:
As a former Airforce aircraft mechanic I was stunned when I heard the report that nukes had inadvertantly been loaded on a B-52 and flown across country. It would be a mistake of staggering porportions if this had happened by mistake. Anyone who is familiar with Airforce procedures regarding even the simplest of procedures where aircraft are concerned would know that it would be all but impossible to make this kind of mistake.
Those who work on the line are some of the most professional men and women I have ever known. Every one of them understand the inherent risks that are involved in this kind of work and follow the procedures accordingly. With the many layers of control that exist in this kind of work, there are too many individuals that have to sign off on anything that is done. Even more so when handling weapons of any kind.
Clearly someone on the inside wanted us to know this had happened.
And from The Independent:
In addition to the munitions squadron commander who was relieved of his duties, crews involved with the mistaken load — including ground crew workers — have been temporarily suspended from handling munitions, one official said.
Sounds like they’re punishing all of them because they don’t know which one leaked it…





personally I don’t believe it was an accident.
after being on a submarine for a few years and listening to guys talk about when they carried nukes, the controls you have to go through for one of those things is unreal.
someone messed up maybe, but this plane didn’t fly over the country by accident.
Check out Larry Johnson’s take over at NoQuarter:
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2007/09/05/staging-nukes-for-iran/#more-817
[...] at Suburban Guerrilla in points to two comments on the Larry Johnson site [...]
from Froomkin’s column 9/5 in the Washington Post:
Draper writes: “When asked if Bush felt in any way ill served by Rumsfeld, or if he believed that Rumsfeld had made crucial mistakes, the president responded both times, ‘No.’ He added, ‘See, every decision’s mine.’ Bush took umbrage at the assertion that he had been deferential to Rumsfeld on the details, saying, ‘Look, I know what questions to ask. I’m in the sixth year of my presidency. We’ve already been through one war together.’ But Bolten, for one, had come to believe that Bush’s interactions with the Pentagon in general and Rumsfeld in particular fell short of hands-on and needed to be changed.”
“We’ve already been through one war together”. Is another in the offing?
just like I thought