Comments on: Buh Bye http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/ Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:30:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Foraker http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133537 Foraker Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:49:17 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133537 Very messy. What courts will they file the liens in? Very messy. What courts will they file the liens in?

]]> By: mbw http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133522 mbw Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:03:08 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133522 None of these guys have standing in Lakota government. None of these guys have standing in Lakota government.

]]> By: Izquierdo http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133518 Izquierdo Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:05:27 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133518 I'm afraid that they are giving [23rd letter of the alphabet] yet another country to invade. I’m afraid that they are giving [23rd letter of the alphabet]
yet another country to invade.

]]> By: American Goose http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133516 American Goose Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:16:02 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133516 I mean "no" MSM... oops. I mean “no” MSM… oops.

]]> By: American Goose http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133515 American Goose Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:15:46 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133515 I'm having visions of lever-action Winchester rifles and whiskey bottles.... Maybe the U.S. Government will give all the Lakota free cable teevee for life. It pacifies the rest of the country and they pay for it. Sounds like a 21st Century solution, appropriately Orwellian. ... ... And why are there no MSM coverages of this on the intertubes? (Brendan's link is busted, btw.) I’m having visions of lever-action Winchester rifles and whiskey bottles….
Maybe the U.S. Government will give all the Lakota free cable teevee for life. It pacifies the rest of the country and they pay for it. Sounds like a 21st Century solution, appropriately Orwellian.
…
…
And why are there no MSM coverages of this on the intertubes? (Brendan’s link is busted, btw.)

]]> By: brendancalling http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133509 brendancalling Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:00:56 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133509 this is great news, and totally hilarious. So what happens next? i can't see the US just sitting back and saying "so long, it's been good to knowya," since that might encourage other tribes to secede too. And what's going to happen when US citizens start getting displaced from their homes (like the lakota sioux were a hundred some-odd years ago)? That component's not in the linked article, <a href="http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2007/12/20/news/top/doc476a99630633e335271152.txt" rel="nofollow">but it IS in this one</a>: <blockquote>The move to form an independent nation will focus on property rights in a five-state area where the treaties in question were drawn up. The states include South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming and Montana – areas that the group say have been illegally homesteaded for years despite knowledge of Lakota as the historic owners. If the U.S. government does not immediately enter into diplomatic negotiations, the group said in a news release, liens will be filed on real-estate transactions across the region -- an action it says could cloud title issues over thousands of square miles of land and property.</blockquote> Things could get a mite messy. this is great news, and totally hilarious. So what happens next? i can’t see the US just sitting back and saying “so long, it’s been good to knowya,” since that might encourage other tribes to secede too. And what’s going to happen when US citizens start getting displaced from their homes (like the lakota sioux were a hundred some-odd years ago)? That component’s not in the linked article, but it IS in this one:

The move to form an independent nation will focus on property rights in a five-state area where the treaties in question were drawn up. The states include South Dakota, North Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming and Montana – areas that the group say have been illegally homesteaded for years despite knowledge of Lakota as the historic owners.

If the U.S. government does not immediately enter into diplomatic negotiations, the group said in a news release, liens will be filed on real-estate transactions across the region — an action it says could cloud title issues over thousands of square miles of land and property.

Things could get a mite messy.

]]> By: Maya http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133508 Maya Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:16:18 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133508 can the Constitution be a treaty too so that we can all do this if we want? can the Constitution be a treaty too so that we can all do this if we want?

]]> By: American Goose http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133507 American Goose Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:10:59 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2007/12/20/12/46/buh-bye-7/#comment-133507 It's that easy to opt out of this clusterfuck? wow. who knew? It’s that easy to opt out of this clusterfuck?
wow.

who knew?

]]>