Comments on: The Invisible Man and the Invisible Hand http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/06/08/41/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand/ Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:43:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Izquierdo http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/06/08/41/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand/#comment-134235 Izquierdo Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:20:37 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/06/08/41/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand/#comment-134235 $200K each, or $200K total? $200K each, or $200K total?

]]> By: Linkmeister http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/06/08/41/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand/#comment-134228 Linkmeister Sun, 06 Jan 2008 20:50:14 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/06/08/41/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand/#comment-134228 Did you notice the derisive laugh Charlie Gibson got last night when he posed a hypothetical question about the combined wages of two married professors at St. Anselm, the school where the debate was held? He suggested the two earned upwards of $200K and thus would be losers if the Bush tax cuts were repealed. The audience exploded. Hillary told him "Maybe at NYU, Charlie." Gibson didn't even look chastened. They really should get out more. Did you notice the derisive laugh Charlie Gibson got last night when he posed a hypothetical question about the combined wages of two married professors at St. Anselm, the school where the debate was held? He suggested the two earned upwards of $200K and thus would be losers if the Bush tax cuts were repealed.

The audience exploded. Hillary told him “Maybe at NYU, Charlie.” Gibson didn’t even look chastened.

They really should get out more.

]]> By: Wendy Whinner http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/06/08/41/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand/#comment-134222 Wendy Whinner Sun, 06 Jan 2008 15:39:16 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/06/08/41/the-invisible-man-and-the-invisible-hand/#comment-134222 The problem is how can you be certain what determined how the voters voted? Perhaps the voters ignored the MSM slant and voted the way they felt. Or maybe your theory is correct. Tough to really tell which huh? The problem is how can you be certain what determined how the voters voted? Perhaps the voters ignored the MSM slant and voted the way they felt. Or maybe your theory is correct. Tough to really tell which huh?

]]>