Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.
Jan 9th, 2008 at 7:37 am by Susie
Why are the poll results from the Clinton-Obama race so far off from the results? There might be some good explanation, but as Brad says, considering the past problems with optical-scanned ballots, we shouldn’t assume they’re correct.
You are a Working Class Warrior, also known as a blue-collar Democrat. You believe that the little guy is getting screwed by conservative greed-mongers and corporate criminals, and you’re not going to take it anymore.
Take the quiz at www.FightConservatives.com
Add new tag Barack Obama Democratic Drinking Liberally John McCain Media Philadelphia political coverage polls primary race
Las Vega Vacation Packages
Bad Behavior has blocked 11658 access attempts in the last 7 days.
I didn’t do the click-through, but why Hillary? GOP thinks she’s “doable?” And that’s a huge change from polls. This, at least, should be verifiable. One would think.
In the meantime, I think I have to go throw up.
The numbers look like many independents switched and voted in the Republican primary for McCain because the polls told them that Obama had it in a walk.
Obama out polled Clinton substantially with independents so that would cause quite a shift. It also contributed to McCain’s higher than expected margins.