<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Wonder The Beltway Media Love Him</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Izquierdo</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-136018</link>
		<dc:creator>Izquierdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-136018</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Let’s let them serve out their terms,
then try them as war criminals.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, but Paraguay, where Dubya has bought his huge
 retirement ranch, has no extradition treaty with the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Let’s let them serve out their terms,<br />
then try them as war criminals.</i></p>
<p>Yeah, but Paraguay, where Dubya has bought his huge<br />
 retirement ranch, has no extradition treaty with the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheney's Ass</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135987</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheney's Ass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135987</guid>
		<description>Then why bring it up now?

Suzie, You really seem to have a hard-on for Obama. 
I don't think HE is packaging himself as the progressive savior, I think some in the media are painting him as such.

I think that he is just being pragmatic on this issue.

Let's let them serve out their terms, then try them as war criminals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then why bring it up now?</p>
<p>Suzie, You really seem to have a hard-on for Obama.<br />
I don&#8217;t think HE is packaging himself as the progressive savior, I think some in the media are painting him as such.</p>
<p>I think that he is just being pragmatic on this issue.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s let them serve out their terms, then try them as war criminals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susie</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135982</link>
		<dc:creator>Susie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135982</guid>
		<description>The interview is almost a year old, Noz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interview is almost a year old, Noz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrayaran</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135981</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrayaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135981</guid>
		<description>I don't read the entry as pushing for impeachment.  I read it as upset that the way Obama rules out impeachment implies that he doesn't regard Bush/Cheney's actions as "grave" and "intentional breaches of the president's authority", as does treating calls for impeachment as if they were calls for using it as a "standard political tool".  

A constitutional law scholar should certainly be able to recognize the gravity and intentionality of the many Bush/Cheney excesses, while any practical person can see that there are limited political gains and major political problems involved in actually pursuing impeachment.  So why not say both -- that impeachment is (emphatically) warranted but not practical?  Especially if you believe in upholding the Constitution?  That would be truth in packaging, and it wouldn't require him to do a thing differently... except briefly characterize unconstitutional actions as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t read the entry as pushing for impeachment.  I read it as upset that the way Obama rules out impeachment implies that he doesn&#8217;t regard Bush/Cheney&#8217;s actions as &#8220;grave&#8221; and &#8220;intentional breaches of the president&#8217;s authority&#8221;, as does treating calls for impeachment as if they were calls for using it as a &#8220;standard political tool&#8221;.  </p>
<p>A constitutional law scholar should certainly be able to recognize the gravity and intentionality of the many Bush/Cheney excesses, while any practical person can see that there are limited political gains and major political problems involved in actually pursuing impeachment.  So why not say both &#8212; that impeachment is (emphatically) warranted but not practical?  Especially if you believe in upholding the Constitution?  That would be truth in packaging, and it wouldn&#8217;t require him to do a thing differently&#8230; except briefly characterize unconstitutional actions as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snuzy mandrake</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135980</link>
		<dc:creator>snuzy mandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135980</guid>
		<description>oh and it's worth adding that obama is 100% right when he says:

"I believe if we began impeachment proceedings we will be engulfed in more of the politics that has made Washington dysfunction"

a year ago that wouldn't necessarily be true, but now there is no doubt in my mind that obama is right. there's another better method of getting rid of bush/cheney. an impeachment proceeding would take almost as long as bush has left in office. at this point, it would be nothing but a distraction from beating bush's successors. at this point, mccain and/or romney are much more of a danger to confront.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and it&#8217;s worth adding that obama is 100% right when he says:</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe if we began impeachment proceedings we will be engulfed in more of the politics that has made Washington dysfunction&#8221;</p>
<p>a year ago that wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be true, but now there is no doubt in my mind that obama is right. there&#8217;s another better method of getting rid of bush/cheney. an impeachment proceeding would take almost as long as bush has left in office. at this point, it would be nothing but a distraction from beating bush&#8217;s successors. at this point, mccain and/or romney are much more of a danger to confront.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snuzy mandrake</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135979</link>
		<dc:creator>snuzy mandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135979</guid>
		<description>edwards wasn't pushing for impeachment either.

why are you suddenly insisting on truth in packaging now, when you weren't holding your own candidate to the same standard? i mean, edwards' pre-2006 record was not always that progressive at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>edwards wasn&#8217;t pushing for impeachment either.</p>
<p>why are you suddenly insisting on truth in packaging now, when you weren&#8217;t holding your own candidate to the same standard? i mean, edwards&#8217; pre-2006 record was not always that progressive at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susie</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135975</link>
		<dc:creator>Susie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135975</guid>
		<description>No one's trying to sell Hillary as a progressive savior. Since I'm not thrilled with either of them, I do reserve the right to insist on truth in packaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one&#8217;s trying to sell Hillary as a progressive savior. Since I&#8217;m not thrilled with either of them, I do reserve the right to insist on truth in packaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrSnrub</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135974</link>
		<dc:creator>MrSnrub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135974</guid>
		<description>Yeah, 'cause Hillary is so much better.  =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, &#8217;cause Hillary is so much better.  =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somegirl</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135970</link>
		<dc:creator>somegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/06/15/25/no-wonder-the-beltway-media-love-him/#comment-135970</guid>
		<description>one more reason not to go gaga for obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one more reason not to go gaga for obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
