<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ho Hum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Joe Liebling's Dog</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/#comment-136288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Joe Liebling's Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/#comment-136288</guid>
		<description>One of these days? 

One of these days. Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of these days? </p>
<p>One of these days. Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarki, child of Loki</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/#comment-136280</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarki, child of Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/#comment-136280</guid>
		<description>Impeach the prosecutor that doesn't bring charges.  Yeah, he was "ordered" by DOJ, but "just following orders" isn't a defence. 

Is this punishing the low-level USA's for the sins of their bosses? Perhaps, but USA's really do have a lot of discretion, so make 'em sweat.  Besides, impeachment isn't punishment, it's removing from office someone who WON'T DO THEIR FUCKING JOB!

That's not to say that the rest shouldn't be impeached as well, but you have to start somewhere.  In fact, I think you could make a good case for a blanket impeachment of the *entire* Bush administration, which would tie up the Senate so that they couldn't pass abominations like the FISA bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impeach the prosecutor that doesn&#8217;t bring charges.  Yeah, he was &#8220;ordered&#8221; by DOJ, but &#8220;just following orders&#8221; isn&#8217;t a defence. </p>
<p>Is this punishing the low-level USA&#8217;s for the sins of their bosses? Perhaps, but USA&#8217;s really do have a lot of discretion, so make &#8216;em sweat.  Besides, impeachment isn&#8217;t punishment, it&#8217;s removing from office someone who WON&#8217;T DO THEIR FUCKING JOB!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that the rest shouldn&#8217;t be impeached as well, but you have to start somewhere.  In fact, I think you could make a good case for a blanket impeachment of the *entire* Bush administration, which would tie up the Senate so that they couldn&#8217;t pass abominations like the FISA bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/#comment-136279</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/13/08/01/ho-hum-11/#comment-136279</guid>
		<description>How will they get out of it this time? I don't know enough about "games played in House of (non) Representatives" to speculate on this. Although now that I think of it, that line from Dogma, "Oh, shit! It's the Pope!" would probably work as a duck-and-cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will they get out of it this time? I don&#8217;t know enough about &#8220;games played in House of (non) Representatives&#8221; to speculate on this. Although now that I think of it, that line from Dogma, &#8220;Oh, shit! It&#8217;s the Pope!&#8221; would probably work as a duck-and-cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
