Edwards Weighs Endorsing Clinton
Feb 13th, 2008 at 10:25 pm by Susie
But may not endorse at all.
3 Responses to “Edwards Weighs Endorsing Clinton”
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- December 2008 (29)
- November 2008 (633)
- October 2008 (593)
- September 2008 (617)
- August 2008 (521)
- July 2008 (432)
- June 2008 (394)
- May 2008 (336)
- April 2008 (351)
- March 2008 (379)
- February 2008 (355)
- January 2008 (434)
- December 2007 (350)
- November 2007 (323)
- October 2007 (364)
- September 2007 (329)
- August 2007 (415)
- July 2007 (411)
- June 2007 (395)
- May 2007 (259)
- April 2007 (208)
- March 2007 (214)
- February 2007 (228)
- January 2007 (290)
- December 2006 (395)
- November 2006 (562)
- October 2006 (497)
- September 2006 (522)
- August 2006 (479)
- July 2006 (394)
- June 2006 (383)
- May 2006 (417)
- April 2006 (342)
- March 2006 (474)
- February 2006 (445)
- January 2006 (494)
- December 2005 (419)
- November 2005 (448)
- October 2005 (510)
- September 2005 (454)
- August 2005 (508)
- July 2005 (532)
- June 2005 (458)
- May 2005 (330)
- April 2005 (429)
- March 2005 (475)
- February 2005 (458)
- January 2005 (446)
- December 2004 (356)
- November 2004 (440)
- October 2004 (433)
- September 2004 (298)
- August 2004 (353)
- July 2004 (319)
- June 2004 (366)
- May 2004 (347)
- April 2004 (389)
- March 2004 (468)
- February 2004 (399)
- January 2004 (417)
- December 2003 (293)
- November 2003 (281)
- October 2003 (320)
- September 2003 (331)
- August 2003 (287)
- July 2003 (323)
- June 2003 (332)
- May 2003 (433)
- 0 (1)
-
Categories
- Action Alert (65)
- Arts & Music (1077)
- Astral Weather (25)
- Blind Justice (184)
- Blogosphere (154)
- Class War (406)
- Communism for the Rich (204)
- Corporate Statism (885)
- Customer Service Hell (36)
- Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (917)
- Disastrous (52)
- Feature or Bug (9)
- Friday Fun (18)
- FUBAR (10)
- Fuck the Poor (217)
- Full Frontal Feminism (67)
- Geek Stuff (113)
- General (7879)
- Higher Ground (137)
- Humor (186)
- Imaginary Global Warming (58)
- Impeach This (86)
- IOKIYAR (146)
- Just a Goddamn Piece of Paper (117)
- Just Plain Crazy (74)
- Keystone Kommandos (1)
- Life in the Big City (50)
- Media (469)
- My So-Called Life (243)
- Oddball (54)
- Our Booming Economy (277)
- Paranoia Strikes Deep (43)
- Picture This (7)
- Pointless Crap (5)
- Politics As Usual (2365)
- Power to the People (120)
- Progress (3)
- Real-Life Fiction (1)
- Recession Depression (556)
- Republicans Are Good With Money (338)
- Star Talk (10)
- Terra Terra Terra! (118)
- The American Game (115)
- The Best Healthcare in the World (129)
- The Body Electric (134)
- The Peter Principle (1)
- The Regime (682)
- The Shadow Knows (96)
- Theocracy (101)
- Tip O'The Day (2)
- War Crimes (190)
- War Stories (168)
- Whiny Ass Titty Babies (3)
- Why I'm Not A Catholic Anymore (6)
-
Tags
Add new tag Barack Obama Democratic Drinking Liberally John McCain Media Philadelphia political coverage polls primary race
-
Pages
My Liberal Identity:
You are a Working Class Warrior, also known as a blue-collar Democrat. You believe that the little guy is getting screwed by conservative greed-mongers and corporate criminals, and you’re not going to take it anymore.
Take the quiz at www.FightConservatives.com
accoustic guitar tuner @ HTTAG
View My Stats
casino tournaments
If you read the article, it may just as well have been titled, “Edwards May Endorse Obama”.
It’s last week’s news put out to get Hillary some headlines to distract from her losses in the “Potomac Primary”.
This is interesting:
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/02/clinton_counts.html
No, the reason it was NEWS is that no one expected him to seriously consider endorsing Hillary. That was in the article, too.
I think the time for an Edwards endorsement has passed. Most of his supporters have already made their decision. How many people would change their minds at this point because of his endorsement? A few, perhaps, but not many. Instead, as tensions are fairly high right now between the Clinton and Obama camps, I fear he would only alienate a large chunk of his former supporters, which wouldn’t do anything to further his agenda on poverty. If he remains neutral, I think he’d be more highly regarded, and, thus, more effective in pressuring the candidates to take on his stands. He now has allies within both camps who would like to see his ideas adopted. He could also play a role as peacemaker, which we may need. I’m concerned about the ugly atmosphere developing within the party. People like Edwards, Richardson, Biden, etc. would do more good at this point in bringing everyone together rather than taking sides in an intra-party split. If they were going to endorse, they should’ve done so back down the road.