<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indiscreet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: babaloo</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/#comment-137054</link>
		<dc:creator>babaloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/#comment-137054</guid>
		<description>Give them a break!  She was just his "minder" taking him here and there to perform his "corporate" duties.
Has anyone noticed that this took place during the time that wife Cindy was hooked on prescription drugs (even stealing them from her self-created nonprofit)?  I guess we now know why John didn't notice Cindy's problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give them a break!  She was just his &#8220;minder&#8221; taking him here and there to perform his &#8220;corporate&#8221; duties.<br />
Has anyone noticed that this took place during the time that wife Cindy was hooked on prescription drugs (even stealing them from her self-created nonprofit)?  I guess we now know why John didn&#8217;t notice Cindy&#8217;s problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susie</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/#comment-136939</link>
		<dc:creator>Susie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/#comment-136939</guid>
		<description>Having sex with lobbyists is probably a slightly more direct version of what goes on anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having sex with lobbyists is probably a slightly more direct version of what goes on anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarki, child of Loki</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/#comment-136938</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarki, child of Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/20/20/47/indiscreet/#comment-136938</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I just don’t care who’s banging who - as long as they’re not trying to make me into a criminal if I do the same thing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Susie,
to do "the same thing", you'd have to have senatorial-level influence, which could be corrupted by banging a lobbyist.  While your blogospheric power is legendary, I have a hard time seeing &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; quid-pro-quo banging to get on your blogroll getting to the level of  "criminal".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I just don’t care who’s banging who - as long as they’re not trying to make me into a criminal if I do the same thing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Susie,<br />
to do &#8220;the same thing&#8221;, you&#8217;d have to have senatorial-level influence, which could be corrupted by banging a lobbyist.  While your blogospheric power is legendary, I have a hard time seeing <i>any</i> quid-pro-quo banging to get on your blogroll getting to the level of  &#8220;criminal&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
