<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: memyself</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137449</link>
		<dc:creator>memyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137449</guid>
		<description>Here's a video that is so close it begs the question of whether there was some blatant plagiarism by the Clinton staff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPadP7eAO9Y</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a video that is so close it begs the question of whether there was some blatant plagiarism by the Clinton staff.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPadP7eAO9Y" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPadP7eAO9Y</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbw</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137399</link>
		<dc:creator>mbw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137399</guid>
		<description>Eric has a pretty interesting take on this:

http://wampum.wabanaki.net/vault/2008/02/004300.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric has a pretty interesting take on this:</p>
<p><a href="http://wampum.wabanaki.net/vault/2008/02/004300.html" rel="nofollow">http://wampum.wabanaki.net/vault/2008/02/004300.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137369</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137369</guid>
		<description>steveeboy, just to clear something up, I don't think anybody who posts here has actually chosen her as our candidate. At least I know I certainly haven't and Susie has been pretty clear that she hasn't either. I'm not sure who Maya, Dr. S or PSoDT are backing, but I certainly haven't seen them back anybody specifically here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steveeboy, just to clear something up, I don&#8217;t think anybody who posts here has actually chosen her as our candidate. At least I know I certainly haven&#8217;t and Susie has been pretty clear that she hasn&#8217;t either. I&#8217;m not sure who Maya, Dr. S or PSoDT are backing, but I certainly haven&#8217;t seen them back anybody specifically here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveeboy</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137366</link>
		<dc:creator>steveeboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/02/29/14/06/wolves/#comment-137366</guid>
		<description>Surely at this point you are starting to see a problem with your chosen candidate and her staffers?

this is my favorite from Duncan/Ezra Klein  and the imploding Hillary campaign in the last 15 minutes:


To: Interested Parties
From: The Clinton Campaign
Date: Friday, February 29, 2008
RE: Obama Must-Wins

The media has anointed Barack Obama the presumptive nominee and he's playing the part.

With an eleven state winning streak coming out of February, Senator Obama is riding a surge of momentum that has enabled him to pour unprecedented resources into Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont.

The Obama campaign and its allies are outspending us two to one in paid media and have sent more staff into the March 4 states. In fact, when all is totaled, Senator Obama and his allies have outspent Senator Clinton by a margin of $18.4 million to $9.2 million on advertising in the four states that are voting next Tuesday.

Senator Obama has campaigned hard in these states. He has spent time meeting editorial boards, courting endorsers, holding rallies, and - of course - making speeches.

If he cannot win all of these states with all this effort, there's a problem.

Should Senator Obama fail to score decisive victories with all of the resources and effort he is bringing to bear, the message will be clear:

Democrats, the majority of whom have favored Hillary in the primary contests held to date, have their doubts about Senator Obama and are having second thoughts about him as a prospective standard-bearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely at this point you are starting to see a problem with your chosen candidate and her staffers?</p>
<p>this is my favorite from Duncan/Ezra Klein  and the imploding Hillary campaign in the last 15 minutes:</p>
<p>To: Interested Parties<br />
From: The Clinton Campaign<br />
Date: Friday, February 29, 2008<br />
RE: Obama Must-Wins</p>
<p>The media has anointed Barack Obama the presumptive nominee and he&#8217;s playing the part.</p>
<p>With an eleven state winning streak coming out of February, Senator Obama is riding a surge of momentum that has enabled him to pour unprecedented resources into Texas, Ohio, Rhode Island and Vermont.</p>
<p>The Obama campaign and its allies are outspending us two to one in paid media and have sent more staff into the March 4 states. In fact, when all is totaled, Senator Obama and his allies have outspent Senator Clinton by a margin of $18.4 million to $9.2 million on advertising in the four states that are voting next Tuesday.</p>
<p>Senator Obama has campaigned hard in these states. He has spent time meeting editorial boards, courting endorsers, holding rallies, and - of course - making speeches.</p>
<p>If he cannot win all of these states with all this effort, there&#8217;s a problem.</p>
<p>Should Senator Obama fail to score decisive victories with all of the resources and effort he is bringing to bear, the message will be clear:</p>
<p>Democrats, the majority of whom have favored Hillary in the primary contests held to date, have their doubts about Senator Obama and are having second thoughts about him as a prospective standard-bearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
