Comments on: Devil in the Details http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/28/06/23/devil-in-the-details/ Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media. Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:51:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: demeur http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/28/06/23/devil-in-the-details/#comment-139738 demeur Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:01:57 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/28/06/23/devil-in-the-details/#comment-139738 Ron Not to mention that if you can't pay the premiums your wages get garnished. No thank you Hillary. Ron
Not to mention that if you can’t pay the premiums your wages get garnished. No thank you Hillary.

]]> By: Ron http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/28/06/23/devil-in-the-details/#comment-139648 Ron Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:06:41 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/28/06/23/devil-in-the-details/#comment-139648 Sorry, Edwards proposal was it. This is still coverage for for-profit health insurers. Amoral cover for amoral business. Sorry, Edwards proposal was it. This is still coverage for for-profit health insurers. Amoral cover for amoral business.

]]> By: fred http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/28/06/23/devil-in-the-details/#comment-139644 fred Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:28:18 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/2008/03/28/06/23/devil-in-the-details/#comment-139644 This is an interesting proposal and one I could probably get behind if she has offered more details. Between what I kick in and what my employer provides this would be roughly a 50% savings, primarily to my employer, at the 10% threshold. Some follow up is required! This is an interesting proposal and one I could probably get behind if she has offered more details. Between what I kick in and what my employer provides this would be roughly a 50% savings, primarily to my employer, at the 10% threshold.

Some follow up is required!

]]>