<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: memyself</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/#comment-140272</link>
		<dc:creator>memyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/#comment-140272</guid>
		<description>Interestingly Obama's higher rate of increase relative to Clinton's  in the PA polls does not seem to have been impacted:

http://www.pollster.com/08-PA-Dem-Pres-Primary.php

If the trends hold, Hillary wins PA by 5 - 8 % while Obama wins NC by close to 20%:

http://www.pollster.com/08-NC-Dem-Pres-Primary.php

If the margins do look like the trends predict, there be little to no net delegate gain for Clinton between the two races.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly Obama&#8217;s higher rate of increase relative to Clinton&#8217;s  in the PA polls does not seem to have been impacted:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pollster.com/08-PA-Dem-Pres-Primary.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.pollster.com/08-PA-Dem-Pres-Primary.php</a></p>
<p>If the trends hold, Hillary wins PA by 5 - 8 % while Obama wins NC by close to 20%:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pollster.com/08-NC-Dem-Pres-Primary.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.pollster.com/08-NC-Dem-Pres-Primary.php</a></p>
<p>If the margins do look like the trends predict, there be little to no net delegate gain for Clinton between the two races.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/#comment-140240</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/#comment-140240</guid>
		<description>I am truly a freak, because that whole Wright crisis made me more supportive of Obama, maybe because I went through and read all those inconvenient back stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am truly a freak, because that whole Wright crisis made me more supportive of Obama, maybe because I went through and read all those inconvenient back stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memyself</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/#comment-140229</link>
		<dc:creator>memyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/05/00/16/new-poll/#comment-140229</guid>
		<description>Looking at all polls plotted on one chart what it looks like is a flattening of the rate of increase for the past few weeks for both candidates. The combination of statistical error and undecideds has basically had Clinton and Obama tied since right after super Tuesday, with Obama showing  more data points on the plus side. From a big picture perspective I'd say Obama's rate of increase in support was probably slowed by the ginning up of the Wright  "controversy" but that the support he had already achieved remained pretty steady.

CBS has a new poll that shows the Wright issue being left behind.

"Obama is viewed unfavorably by 24 percent of all voters, back to where it was before last month's controversy over his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright."

http://www.pollster.com/08-US-Dem-Pres-Primary.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at all polls plotted on one chart what it looks like is a flattening of the rate of increase for the past few weeks for both candidates. The combination of statistical error and undecideds has basically had Clinton and Obama tied since right after super Tuesday, with Obama showing  more data points on the plus side. From a big picture perspective I&#8217;d say Obama&#8217;s rate of increase in support was probably slowed by the ginning up of the Wright  &#8220;controversy&#8221; but that the support he had already achieved remained pretty steady.</p>
<p>CBS has a new poll that shows the Wright issue being left behind.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama is viewed unfavorably by 24 percent of all voters, back to where it was before last month&#8217;s controversy over his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pollster.com/08-US-Dem-Pres-Primary.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.pollster.com/08-US-Dem-Pres-Primary.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
