<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WTF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140655</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140655</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Advocating for seating the delegates after the non democratic primaries is very clearly participation in Florida or Michigan delegate selection process - which Clinton pledged NOT to do unless they held a DNC sanctioned vote.&lt;/i&gt;

Really, do yourself a favor and look at the actual pledge; the only thing the candidates pledged not to do was campaign or participate in the &lt;i&gt;primary&lt;/i&gt; of any state that broke the timing rules.  "Campaign" was defined, but "participate" was not, meaning that there is no way to say that one action or another is "very clearly participation" since "participation" is very much open to interpretation.  The pledge said nothing about delegate selection, which makes perfect sense because delegate selection is not within the authority of the candidates.  

I don't hold out much hope that you will look at the actual pledge, though; I've been asking people to read the rules and the pledge for a couple of months now, and nobody takes me up on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Advocating for seating the delegates after the non democratic primaries is very clearly participation in Florida or Michigan delegate selection process - which Clinton pledged NOT to do unless they held a DNC sanctioned vote.</i></p>
<p>Really, do yourself a favor and look at the actual pledge; the only thing the candidates pledged not to do was campaign or participate in the <i>primary</i> of any state that broke the timing rules.  &#8220;Campaign&#8221; was defined, but &#8220;participate&#8221; was not, meaning that there is no way to say that one action or another is &#8220;very clearly participation&#8221; since &#8220;participation&#8221; is very much open to interpretation.  The pledge said nothing about delegate selection, which makes perfect sense because delegate selection is not within the authority of the candidates.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hold out much hope that you will look at the actual pledge, though; I&#8217;ve been asking people to read the rules and the pledge for a couple of months now, and nobody takes me up on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snuzy mandrake</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140638</link>
		<dc:creator>snuzy mandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140638</guid>
		<description>lambert,

when you translate any criticism of clinton into "the bitch made me do it!" you're minimizing the real sexist attacks used against clinton. people can be against clinton for reasons that have nothing to do with her sex. i know you're being flip, but actually it's comments like yours that make people take outcries about actual sexist attacks against her less seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lambert,</p>
<p>when you translate any criticism of clinton into &#8220;the bitch made me do it!&#8221; you&#8217;re minimizing the real sexist attacks used against clinton. people can be against clinton for reasons that have nothing to do with her sex. i know you&#8217;re being flip, but actually it&#8217;s comments like yours that make people take outcries about actual sexist attacks against her less seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smgumby</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140596</link>
		<dc:creator>Smgumby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140596</guid>
		<description>When candidates openly talk about "raiding" the delegates of their competition, it makes sense to ensure your delegates are those that "can't be raided".

I'm so frickin tired of this election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When candidates openly talk about &#8220;raiding&#8221; the delegates of their competition, it makes sense to ensure your delegates are those that &#8220;can&#8217;t be raided&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so frickin tired of this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petey</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140593</link>
		<dc:creator>Petey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140593</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"WTF?"&lt;/i&gt;

If you find this surprising, you really haven't been paying attention to the Obama campaign over the past year.

Their decision to oppose universal healthcare was the signal that, appearances aside, theirs was an explicitly anti-progressive campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;WTF?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>If you find this surprising, you really haven&#8217;t been paying attention to the Obama campaign over the past year.</p>
<p>Their decision to oppose universal healthcare was the signal that, appearances aside, theirs was an explicitly anti-progressive campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140588</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140588</guid>
		<description>Everyone take the pledge, let Howard Dean know:

We can put a stop to the FL - MI problem. Take the pledge: 

"If MI and FL are not brought into the national picture immediately and their votes counted, and if Obama is the Democratic nominee, I will not vote for president in November.  If MI and FL are returned to the national picture immediately and their votes counted, then I will vote for the Democratic nominee whomever it is". 

If enough of us take the pledge then Dean has few choices. If he makes the wrong choice then Obama will have no chance to be President. Period. The only chance for Obama and choice for Dean is to bring FL and MI into the equation, now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone take the pledge, let Howard Dean know:</p>
<p>We can put a stop to the FL - MI problem. Take the pledge: </p>
<p>&#8220;If MI and FL are not brought into the national picture immediately and their votes counted, and if Obama is the Democratic nominee, I will not vote for president in November.  If MI and FL are returned to the national picture immediately and their votes counted, then I will vote for the Democratic nominee whomever it is&#8221;. </p>
<p>If enough of us take the pledge then Dean has few choices. If he makes the wrong choice then Obama will have no chance to be President. Period. The only chance for Obama and choice for Dean is to bring FL and MI into the equation, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sister of ye</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140586</link>
		<dc:creator>sister of ye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140586</guid>
		<description>me me me - I live in SE Mich. where Obama's people were actively soliciting votes for "uncommitted," knowing they'd put up delegates who would be loyal to him. So much for that "no campaigning." It's oly when Clinton got a solid majority that the he got fully behind the disenfranchisement bandwagon.

But he didn't technically break the rules, the same as with that "national ad buy" in Florida, so it's okay, right? I swear, Obama's campaign and supporters project as badly as Rethuglicans. BTW, Clinton's campaign purged 50, versus 900 for Obama's. A big difference, I'd say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>me me me - I live in SE Mich. where Obama&#8217;s people were actively soliciting votes for &#8220;uncommitted,&#8221; knowing they&#8217;d put up delegates who would be loyal to him. So much for that &#8220;no campaigning.&#8221; It&#8217;s oly when Clinton got a solid majority that the he got fully behind the disenfranchisement bandwagon.</p>
<p>But he didn&#8217;t technically break the rules, the same as with that &#8220;national ad buy&#8221; in Florida, so it&#8217;s okay, right? I swear, Obama&#8217;s campaign and supporters project as badly as Rethuglicans. BTW, Clinton&#8217;s campaign purged 50, versus 900 for Obama&#8217;s. A big difference, I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrSnrub</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140585</link>
		<dc:creator>MrSnrub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140585</guid>
		<description>White n AZ:

Thanks for being ever so helpful.  I was asking for confirmation, not stating it as gospel.  =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White n AZ:</p>
<p>Thanks for being ever so helpful.  I was asking for confirmation, not stating it as gospel.  =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lambert Strether, Philadelphia, PA</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140584</link>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Strether, Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140584</guid>
		<description>memyself writes:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
I believe that this is a direct result of Clinton ...
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Let me translate this into the vulgate:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
The bitch made me do it!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Glad to help out. No thanks necessary. (Though I'm surprised this was #3 in the thread. I would have thought #1, for sure.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>memyself writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>
I believe that this is a direct result of Clinton &#8230;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Let me translate this into the vulgate:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The bitch made me do it!
</p></blockquote>
<p>Glad to help out. No thanks necessary. (Though I&#8217;m surprised this was #3 in the thread. I would have thought #1, for sure.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: white_n_az</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140581</link>
		<dc:creator>white_n_az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140581</guid>
		<description>and by the way...&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcy-winograd/obama-delegate-purge----s_b_96102.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Marcy Winograd on HuffPo in a different post&lt;/a&gt; really is quite put out by the whole affair. These are comments from Marcy, an Obama supporter...
&lt;blockquote&gt;Who was left standing, still in the running for the Sunday delegate caucuses?

The bundlers, the men and women who skirt campaign finance laws by bundling cash, a bundle of $2,000 here and a bundle of $2,000 there -- and some, though certainly not all, of the elbow-grease: grassroots Obama volunteers, loyalists from day one.

Who was kicked to the curb? Brian Leubitz, a Calitics blogger with a mighty pen, Tad Daley, former policy advisor to Cranston and Kucinich and a career fellow with the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Alan Toy, a disabled rights activist and Chair of the American Civil Liberties Union chapter in Santa Monica, and a nameless, yet tireless grassroots volunteer who toiled nights making precinct maps... and me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I see a number of Obama themes going down in flames here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and by the way&#8230;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcy-winograd/obama-delegate-purge----s_b_96102.html" rel="nofollow">Marcy Winograd on HuffPo in a different post</a> really is quite put out by the whole affair. These are comments from Marcy, an Obama supporter&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Who was left standing, still in the running for the Sunday delegate caucuses?</p>
<p>The bundlers, the men and women who skirt campaign finance laws by bundling cash, a bundle of $2,000 here and a bundle of $2,000 there &#8212; and some, though certainly not all, of the elbow-grease: grassroots Obama volunteers, loyalists from day one.</p>
<p>Who was kicked to the curb? Brian Leubitz, a Calitics blogger with a mighty pen, Tad Daley, former policy advisor to Cranston and Kucinich and a career fellow with the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Alan Toy, a disabled rights activist and Chair of the American Civil Liberties Union chapter in Santa Monica, and a nameless, yet tireless grassroots volunteer who toiled nights making precinct maps&#8230; and me.</p></blockquote>
<p>I see a number of Obama themes going down in flames here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: white_n_az</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140580</link>
		<dc:creator>white_n_az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140580</guid>
		<description>DK is an Obama 527 organization...

Friends don't let friends link to DK because linking drives traffic to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DK is an Obama 527 organization&#8230;</p>
<p>Friends don&#8217;t let friends link to DK because linking drives traffic to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrSnrub</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140578</link>
		<dc:creator>MrSnrub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140578</guid>
		<description>According to this Kos diary, the Obama campaign reversed course on this.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/10/211336/770/769/493487

Has anyone seen confirmation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this Kos diary, the Obama campaign reversed course on this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/10/211336/770/769/493487" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/10/211336/770/769/493487</a></p>
<p>Has anyone seen confirmation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memyself</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140576</link>
		<dc:creator>memyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140576</guid>
		<description>Advocating for seating the delegates after the non democratic primaries is very clearly participation in Florida or Michigan delegate selection process - which Clinton pledged NOT to do unless they held a DNC sanctioned vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advocating for seating the delegates after the non democratic primaries is very clearly participation in Florida or Michigan delegate selection process - which Clinton pledged NOT to do unless they held a DNC sanctioned vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140572</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140572</guid>
		<description>900 purged! Obama is a political Stalin, ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>900 purged! Obama is a political Stalin, ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Lemos</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140569</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Lemos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140569</guid>
		<description>Yes according to today's San Francisco Daily about 900 Obama delegates were purged and 30 Clinton delegates were purged. It's the scale that is noteworthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes according to today&#8217;s San Francisco Daily about 900 Obama delegates were purged and 30 Clinton delegates were purged. It&#8217;s the scale that is noteworthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140568</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140568</guid>
		<description>memyself, have you actually read the pledge they signed? It said nothing about seating the delegates, and it said nothing about any end result for Michigan and Florida.

And, though you may hate Clinton with all your heart, it does not change the fact that she was right about the pledged delegates. Don't be upset because she knows the rules in and out: she didn't make them, she just knows how to play inside them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>memyself, have you actually read the pledge they signed? It said nothing about seating the delegates, and it said nothing about any end result for Michigan and Florida.</p>
<p>And, though you may hate Clinton with all your heart, it does not change the fact that she was right about the pledged delegates. Don&#8217;t be upset because she knows the rules in and out: she didn&#8217;t make them, she just knows how to play inside them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: memyself</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140566</link>
		<dc:creator>memyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140566</guid>
		<description>I believe that this is a direct result of Clinton repeatedly pointing out that pledged delegates are not obligated to vote for the candidate that voters actually elected them to vote for.

... because apparently disenfranchising voters only counts if Clinton gets an advantage. 

I guess that does explain why she agreed in writing to not seating FL and MI ... until she blew the early campaign and found she needed the results of their not quite democratic primaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that this is a direct result of Clinton repeatedly pointing out that pledged delegates are not obligated to vote for the candidate that voters actually elected them to vote for.</p>
<p>&#8230; because apparently disenfranchising voters only counts if Clinton gets an advantage. </p>
<p>I guess that does explain why she agreed in writing to not seating FL and MI &#8230; until she blew the early campaign and found she needed the results of their not quite democratic primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140565</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140565</guid>
		<description>I can't imagine why they would have been concerned about the loyalty of people who immediately wrote inflammatory posts on high profile blogs upon learning that they wouldn't be going to the convention. Boggles the mind really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine why they would have been concerned about the loyalty of people who immediately wrote inflammatory posts on high profile blogs upon learning that they wouldn&#8217;t be going to the convention. Boggles the mind really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrSnrub</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/10/16/57/wtf-17/#comment-140562</link>
		<dc:creator>MrSnrub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24430#comment-140562</guid>
		<description>http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/04/09/calif_delegate_lists_under_scrutiny/

Clinton is doing it too.

(remember Switzerland)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/04/09/calif_delegate_lists_under_scrutiny/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/04/09/calif_delegate_lists_under_scrutiny/</a></p>
<p>Clinton is doing it too.</p>
<p>(remember Switzerland)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
