<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misspoke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raoul Paste</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/#comment-140979</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul Paste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24474#comment-140979</guid>
		<description>You know, Obama did not endorse clinging to guns, he simply stated that people do it, which is true.   
Cmon, Susie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Obama did not endorse clinging to guns, he simply stated that people do it, which is true.<br />
Cmon, Susie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveeboy</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/#comment-140937</link>
		<dc:creator>steveeboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24474#comment-140937</guid>
		<description>rendell tried to attack obama on this by noting that hrc simply had no money to pay WAM and could barely pay media while obama had money to burn--thus implying that she could not pay but he had decided not to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rendell tried to attack obama on this by noting that hrc simply had no money to pay WAM and could barely pay media while obama had money to burn&#8211;thus implying that she could not pay but he had decided not to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/#comment-140928</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24474#comment-140928</guid>
		<description>Brendancalling:
No she won't. (I should point out good on both of them for not paying Volunteers, it kind of defeats the volunteering part).

Neither will she point out that Obama has now said he will investigate Bush crimes in the White House, something Clinton will never do (just like her husband).

It seems someones blind spot is a lot bigger than those she professes to be bothered by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendancalling:<br />
No she won&#8217;t. (I should point out good on both of them for not paying Volunteers, it kind of defeats the volunteering part).</p>
<p>Neither will she point out that Obama has now said he will investigate Bush crimes in the White House, something Clinton will never do (just like her husband).</p>
<p>It seems someones blind spot is a lot bigger than those she professes to be bothered by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendancalling</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/#comment-140922</link>
		<dc:creator>brendancalling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24474#comment-140922</guid>
		<description>speaking of misspeaking, last week you &lt;a href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/11/07/27/no-street-money/" rel="nofollow"&gt;called out Obama for not participating in the street money scam&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I can’t imagine what they’re thinking, unless they’re convinced that people will take the money and support Clinton anyway. I’ll tell you what, though - that street money is especially important in the poorest black wards, the places where you’d expect Obama to do well. I’m guessing the committee people just won’t work all that hard if they don’t get paid.

Or maybe the plan is, they’ll encourage them to take money from Clinton and work for Obama, anyway. Well, it doesn’t work that way here. The street workers will take money from both, and then screw one of them. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

This morning the &lt;a href="http://www.philly.com/dailynews/top_story/20080415_Word_on_the_street__No_election__.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Daily News writes that Clinton's not paying out the street money either.&lt;/a&gt;  

Will you be pointing out her foolishness as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of misspeaking, last week you <a href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/11/07/27/no-street-money/" rel="nofollow">called out Obama for not participating in the street money scam</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>I can’t imagine what they’re thinking, unless they’re convinced that people will take the money and support Clinton anyway. I’ll tell you what, though - that street money is especially important in the poorest black wards, the places where you’d expect Obama to do well. I’m guessing the committee people just won’t work all that hard if they don’t get paid.</p>
<p>Or maybe the plan is, they’ll encourage them to take money from Clinton and work for Obama, anyway. Well, it doesn’t work that way here. The street workers will take money from both, and then screw one of them. </p></blockquote>
<p>This morning the <a href="http://www.philly.com/dailynews/top_story/20080415_Word_on_the_street__No_election__.html" rel="nofollow">Daily News writes that Clinton&#8217;s not paying out the street money either.</a>  </p>
<p>Will you be pointing out her foolishness as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/#comment-140921</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24474#comment-140921</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;His remarks were perhaps his most detailed effort, to date, to recast what he said on the West Coast, when he said that the ailing eonomy in the Rust Belt caused people to "get bitter" and that "they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment ot anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." Tonight, he sought to explain that he never meant to imply that either religion or the use of guns for hunting -- a huge pasttime here in Pennsylvania -- was a bad thing.&lt;/i&gt;

What about antipathy to people who aren't like them, anti-immigrant sentiment, and anti-trade sentiment?  Good things or bad things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>His remarks were perhaps his most detailed effort, to date, to recast what he said on the West Coast, when he said that the ailing eonomy in the Rust Belt caused people to &#8220;get bitter&#8221; and that &#8220;they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren&#8217;t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment ot anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&#8221; Tonight, he sought to explain that he never meant to imply that either religion or the use of guns for hunting &#8212; a huge pasttime here in Pennsylvania &#8212; was a bad thing.</i></p>
<p>What about antipathy to people who aren&#8217;t like them, anti-immigrant sentiment, and anti-trade sentiment?  Good things or bad things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveeboy</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/#comment-140919</link>
		<dc:creator>steveeboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24474#comment-140919</guid>
		<description>sorry susie,

making up sniper fire wholesale on numerous occasions is NOT the same thing as having desperate opponents attack you for demonstrably true statements about the use of wedge issues among white working class voters and how they have been used to secure electoral victories since the time of Nixon.

but hey, stay optimistic, not bitter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry susie,</p>
<p>making up sniper fire wholesale on numerous occasions is NOT the same thing as having desperate opponents attack you for demonstrably true statements about the use of wedge issues among white working class voters and how they have been used to secure electoral victories since the time of Nixon.</p>
<p>but hey, stay optimistic, not bitter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neil</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/15/07/19/misspoke/#comment-140917</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24474#comment-140917</guid>
		<description>When Charlton Heston said you could only take his gun when you pried it from his cold, dead hands, he wasn't &lt;i&gt;clinging&lt;/i&gt; to it, just holding with a firm grip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Charlton Heston said you could only take his gun when you pried it from his cold, dead hands, he wasn&#8217;t <i>clinging</i> to it, just holding with a firm grip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
