<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thomas Franks on Bitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/21/16/42/thomas-franks-on-bitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/21/16/42/thomas-franks-on-bitter/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sister of ye</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/21/16/42/thomas-franks-on-bitter/#comment-141507</link>
		<dc:creator>sister of ye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24572#comment-141507</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;who cares about the cool hundred million she and her husband have mysteriously piled up since he left office? Or her years of loyal service to Sam Walton&lt;/i&gt;

Ah, nothing like throwing in a few unwarranted Clinton smears. Think he's smarting from getting contradicted on his theories by Paul Krugman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>who cares about the cool hundred million she and her husband have mysteriously piled up since he left office? Or her years of loyal service to Sam Walton</i></p>
<p>Ah, nothing like throwing in a few unwarranted Clinton smears. Think he&#8217;s smarting from getting contradicted on his theories by Paul Krugman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izquierdo</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/21/16/42/thomas-franks-on-bitter/#comment-141496</link>
		<dc:creator>Izquierdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24572#comment-141496</guid>
		<description>It's astounding that a Murdoch publication would publish something this honest and clearly expressed.

What's going on here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s astounding that a Murdoch publication would publish something this honest and clearly expressed.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: par4</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/21/16/42/thomas-franks-on-bitter/#comment-141491</link>
		<dc:creator>par4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24572#comment-141491</guid>
		<description>I think he means a modern Solon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he means a modern Solon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
