<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And The Winner Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Snarki, child of Loki</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141729</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarki, child of Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141729</guid>
		<description>when, oh when, will I consistently ready the "posted by" lines? AND remember them from one day to the next. Probably never. Sigh. 

Sorry Chris.  You were amazingly on target.  Props to Susie for having you posting here.  Do you do stock market predictions too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when, oh when, will I consistently ready the &#8220;posted by&#8221; lines? AND remember them from one day to the next. Probably never. Sigh. </p>
<p>Sorry Chris.  You were amazingly on target.  Props to Susie for having you posting here.  Do you do stock market predictions too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susie</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141677</link>
		<dc:creator>Susie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141677</guid>
		<description>I couldn't have done it without you, Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t have done it without you, Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141659</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141659</guid>
		<description>Yeah, um, Susie...with Clinton winning by 9.38% you were only off by 0.24%. Your election predictions truly are awesome! You must be really smart or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, um, Susie&#8230;with Clinton winning by 9.38% you were only off by 0.24%. Your election predictions truly are awesome! You must be really smart or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarki, child of Loki</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141656</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarki, child of Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141656</guid>
		<description>Wow, Susie...your prediction of Clinton by 9.62% was really close to the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Susie&#8230;your prediction of Clinton by 9.62% was really close to the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141649</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141649</guid>
		<description>susie, thank you for linking to lambert.  every little passive-aggressive juvenile fratboy coward who applauded that shit from obama deserves it.  and lambert--thank you for showing them how a real man gets his message across.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>susie, thank you for linking to lambert.  every little passive-aggressive juvenile fratboy coward who applauded that shit from obama deserves it.  and lambert&#8211;thank you for showing them how a real man gets his message across.  <img src='http://susiemadrak.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141645</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141645</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href = "http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/13/29/election-prediction/" rel="nofollow"&gt;I knew this. &lt;/a&gt;

Lambert, geek shit here, but back in the day I actually had one of the bad 90mhz Pentium chips. Didn't make a turd's worth of difference as far as anything, but I was still kind of giddy when I ran the test and saw that the bastard was off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href = "http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/13/29/election-prediction/" rel="nofollow">I knew this. </a></p>
<p>Lambert, geek shit here, but back in the day I actually had one of the bad 90mhz Pentium chips. Didn&#8217;t make a turd&#8217;s worth of difference as far as anything, but I was still kind of giddy when I ran the test and saw that the bastard was off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: white_n_az</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141639</link>
		<dc:creator>white_n_az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141639</guid>
		<description>Actually lambert...there are mathematical terms such as 'floor' which always round down.

thus floor(9.99) =9
or in ruby (which is my preferred language), it would be 
9.99.floor = 9

but the very definition of rounding would absolutely be 
9.50000001 = 10

of course there is another concept called Intel Math...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually lambert&#8230;there are mathematical terms such as &#8216;floor&#8217; which always round down.</p>
<p>thus floor(9.99) =9<br />
or in ruby (which is my preferred language), it would be<br />
9.99.floor = 9</p>
<p>but the very definition of rounding would absolutely be<br />
9.50000001 = 10</p>
<p>of course there is another concept called Intel Math&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lambert strether</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141638</link>
		<dc:creator>lambert strether</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141638</guid>
		<description>Let's remember that a subset of the Obama rules applies to rounding.

That is, 9 does not round up to 10.

9.5 does not round up to 10.

9.9 does not round up to 10.

9.99 does not round up to 10.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s remember that a subset of the Obama rules applies to rounding.</p>
<p>That is, 9 does not round up to 10.</p>
<p>9.5 does not round up to 10.</p>
<p>9.9 does not round up to 10.</p>
<p>9.99 does not round up to 10&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izquierdo</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141633</link>
		<dc:creator>Izquierdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141633</guid>
		<description>And with 94% of the vote counted, it's 55-45.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And with 94% of the vote counted, it&#8217;s 55-45.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: white_n_az</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141626</link>
		<dc:creator>white_n_az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141626</guid>
		<description>No - turnout in Philly was awesome for Obama and gave him about 130,000 vote cushion but the problem for Obama was that he lost the rest of the state by 330,000 votes which is about a 200,000 popular vote/15 delegate gain (approximate).

Also - the final margin appears to be 10% - I'm not sure of the significance of crossing the 10% - everyone's got an opinion on that but it seemed to move Wolf Blitzer.

Side note to lambert - approve my account please (signed up on Sunday)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No - turnout in Philly was awesome for Obama and gave him about 130,000 vote cushion but the problem for Obama was that he lost the rest of the state by 330,000 votes which is about a 200,000 popular vote/15 delegate gain (approximate).</p>
<p>Also - the final margin appears to be 10% - I&#8217;m not sure of the significance of crossing the 10% - everyone&#8217;s got an opinion on that but it seemed to move Wolf Blitzer.</p>
<p>Side note to lambert - approve my account please (signed up on Sunday)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Johnson</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/22/22/36/and-the-winner-is/#comment-141624</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24596#comment-141624</guid>
		<description>Did I hear correctly that only 1 in 10 registered black voters came out to cast a ballot?  Doesn't that erase the argument that his voters will not vote for her in the general?  If they missed the primary why would you consider they will come out in force in the general?  The argument lacks substance if true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I hear correctly that only 1 in 10 registered black voters came out to cast a ballot?  Doesn&#8217;t that erase the argument that his voters will not vote for her in the general?  If they missed the primary why would you consider they will come out in force in the general?  The argument lacks substance if true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
