<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inciting to Riot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Operation Chaos Manini</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141907</link>
		<dc:creator>Operation Chaos Manini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141907</guid>
		<description>As  I recall, didn't Rev. Al Sharpton, months ago, that if Obama lost the nomination, there would be riots in Denver?  This was mentioned back in Jan. '08.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As  I recall, didn&#8217;t Rev. Al Sharpton, months ago, that if Obama lost the nomination, there would be riots in Denver?  This was mentioned back in Jan. &#8216;08.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141839</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141839</guid>
		<description>zuzu @ 10: "...You know, perpetuating the lie that the nomination is Obama’s..."
Yeah, really, all this talk abuot more votes and more delegates somehow equalling his earning the nomination is nothing more than the delusional rantings of Obamaniacs. Clinton has received more votes from "the right kind of people" and that's what really matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zuzu @ 10: &#8220;&#8230;You know, perpetuating the lie that the nomination is Obama’s&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Yeah, really, all this talk abuot more votes and more delegates somehow equalling his earning the nomination is nothing more than the delusional rantings of Obamaniacs. Clinton has received more votes from &#8220;the right kind of people&#8221; and that&#8217;s what really matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Guglielmino</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141835</link>
		<dc:creator>James Guglielmino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141835</guid>
		<description>It takes about two (TWO) minutes to file a complaint. Just go to the FCC and follow the links. It is a piece of cake. Go do it.
JGug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes about two (TWO) minutes to file a complaint. Just go to the FCC and follow the links. It is a piece of cake. Go do it.<br />
JGug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141832</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141832</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;unless HRC carries out her plan to steal the nomination at the convention of course&lt;/i&gt;

You know, perpetuating the lie that the nomination is Obama's and that the only way that Clinton could possibly win is to "steal" it does not really help with the riot scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>unless HRC carries out her plan to steal the nomination at the convention of course</i></p>
<p>You know, perpetuating the lie that the nomination is Obama&#8217;s and that the only way that Clinton could possibly win is to &#8220;steal&#8221; it does not really help with the riot scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141820</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141820</guid>
		<description>First, it was Rush's usual inane rambling and thus difficult to break down properly but when he said "...that’s the best damn thing that can happen to this country..." he could just has easily have been referring to "will see to it we don’t elect Democrats" as "...riots in Denver..." and frankly, a first year law student could handle the case and have it thrown out of court in about 10 seconds based on that alone.
Second, what ever happened to free speech? I loathe Limbaugh but will defend his right to speak. Not liking his politics is no reason to grasp at straws and try to bring him - and the First Amendment - down. 
And don't bother arguing about "fire in a movie theater" - Limbaugh was clearly making a political point - the exact discourse the First Amendment was written to protect. Fight Limbaugh with logic and facts – not suppression of free speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, it was Rush&#8217;s usual inane rambling and thus difficult to break down properly but when he said &#8220;&#8230;that’s the best damn thing that can happen to this country&#8230;&#8221; he could just has easily have been referring to &#8220;will see to it we don’t elect Democrats&#8221; as &#8220;&#8230;riots in Denver&#8230;&#8221; and frankly, a first year law student could handle the case and have it thrown out of court in about 10 seconds based on that alone.<br />
Second, what ever happened to free speech? I loathe Limbaugh but will defend his right to speak. Not liking his politics is no reason to grasp at straws and try to bring him - and the First Amendment - down.<br />
And don&#8217;t bother arguing about &#8220;fire in a movie theater&#8221; - Limbaugh was clearly making a political point - the exact discourse the First Amendment was written to protect. Fight Limbaugh with logic and facts – not suppression of free speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarki, child of Loki</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141812</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarki, child of Loki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141812</guid>
		<description>It's nonsense to think that McCain would be subject to violence. 

But it DOES make sense to be concerned that he's going to "stroke out" before Jan 20th; the guy is so old that he shouldn't be buying green bananas, let alone running for president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nonsense to think that McCain would be subject to violence. </p>
<p>But it DOES make sense to be concerned that he&#8217;s going to &#8220;stroke out&#8221; before Jan 20th; the guy is so old that he shouldn&#8217;t be buying green bananas, let alone running for president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141810</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141810</guid>
		<description>"There won't be riots at our convention," Limbaugh said of the Republican National Convention. "We don't riot. We don't burn our cars. We don't burn down our houses. We don't kill our children. We don't do half the things the American left does."
He really should have made it clear that "we" don't do it in our own country.
And Wendy - wasn't that post the other day referring to McCain setting himself up to be shot to gain a political advantage? Although perhaps publishing such musings could or should be seen as advocating it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There won&#8217;t be riots at our convention,&#8221; Limbaugh said of the Republican National Convention. &#8220;We don&#8217;t riot. We don&#8217;t burn our cars. We don&#8217;t burn down our houses. We don&#8217;t kill our children. We don&#8217;t do half the things the American left does.&#8221;<br />
He really should have made it clear that &#8220;we&#8221; don&#8217;t do it in our own country.<br />
And Wendy - wasn&#8217;t that post the other day referring to McCain setting himself up to be shot to gain a political advantage? Although perhaps publishing such musings could or should be seen as advocating it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveeboy</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141809</link>
		<dc:creator>steveeboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141809</guid>
		<description>actually, a friend was telling me on election night that there are a variety of lefty groups planning to protest the dem convention and that their motto is a riff on "bringing 68 to 08" or some such nonsense.

why any protest group would show up in denver rather than minneapolis--unless HRC carries out her plan to steal the nomination at the convention of course--is beyond comprehension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, a friend was telling me on election night that there are a variety of lefty groups planning to protest the dem convention and that their motto is a riff on &#8220;bringing 68 to 08&#8243; or some such nonsense.</p>
<p>why any protest group would show up in denver rather than minneapolis&#8211;unless HRC carries out her plan to steal the nomination at the convention of course&#8211;is beyond comprehension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141798</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141798</guid>
		<description>Ooh, another Brooks Brothers riot?

More likely than infiltrators are outside agitators to get demonstrators riled up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, another Brooks Brothers riot?</p>
<p>More likely than infiltrators are outside agitators to get demonstrators riled up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Johnson</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141795</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141795</guid>
		<description>And I would be a little concerned to see if they bring on Blackwater to serve as security.  I may becoming paranoid but I secretly think of a coup with this group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I would be a little concerned to see if they bring on Blackwater to serve as security.  I may becoming paranoid but I secretly think of a coup with this group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sister of ye</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141794</link>
		<dc:creator>sister of ye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141794</guid>
		<description>Sure Rethugs would pose as unruly Dems to smear the party. Even more likely that they'd hire people to do the dirty. If you read your history, it's actually SOP for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure Rethugs would pose as unruly Dems to smear the party. Even more likely that they&#8217;d hire people to do the dirty. If you read your history, it&#8217;s actually SOP for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Whinner</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141793</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Whinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141793</guid>
		<description>Take it from me, Republicans would rather die and go to hell than be mistaken for a dweeb democrat. 

And Susie- just the other day, you made a post about a friend of yours who predicted/ wondered if McCain was going to be shot for some devious reason. Based on that warped thinking, your friend could not be more f-ed up and insecure and angry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take it from me, Republicans would rather die and go to hell than be mistaken for a dweeb democrat. </p>
<p>And Susie- just the other day, you made a post about a friend of yours who predicted/ wondered if McCain was going to be shot for some devious reason. Based on that warped thinking, your friend could not be more f-ed up and insecure and angry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbd</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/04/24/20/58/inciting-to-riot/#comment-141789</link>
		<dc:creator>lbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24622#comment-141789</guid>
		<description>I hope that this doesn't end up as some sort of contelpro project--i.e. Republicans disguised as democrats provoking a riot in Denver during the convention.  A riot would certainly serve the GOP agenda, and the media's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that this doesn&#8217;t end up as some sort of contelpro project&#8211;i.e. Republicans disguised as democrats provoking a riot in Denver during the convention.  A riot would certainly serve the GOP agenda, and the media&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
