I think Obama’s right on this one.
15 Responses to “Gas Tax”
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Posts
-
Archives
- May 2008 (161)
- April 2008 (351)
- March 2008 (379)
- February 2008 (355)
- January 2008 (434)
- December 2007 (350)
- November 2007 (323)
- October 2007 (364)
- September 2007 (329)
- August 2007 (415)
- July 2007 (411)
- June 2007 (395)
- May 2007 (259)
- April 2007 (208)
- March 2007 (214)
- February 2007 (228)
- January 2007 (290)
- December 2006 (395)
- November 2006 (562)
- October 2006 (497)
- September 2006 (522)
- August 2006 (479)
- July 2006 (394)
- June 2006 (383)
- May 2006 (417)
- April 2006 (342)
- March 2006 (474)
- February 2006 (445)
- January 2006 (494)
- December 2005 (419)
- November 2005 (448)
- October 2005 (510)
- September 2005 (454)
- August 2005 (508)
- July 2005 (532)
- June 2005 (458)
- May 2005 (330)
- April 2005 (429)
- March 2005 (475)
- February 2005 (458)
- January 2005 (446)
- December 2004 (356)
- November 2004 (440)
- October 2004 (433)
- September 2004 (298)
- August 2004 (353)
- July 2004 (319)
- June 2004 (366)
- May 2004 (347)
- April 2004 (389)
- March 2004 (468)
- February 2004 (399)
- January 2004 (417)
- December 2003 (293)
- November 2003 (281)
- October 2003 (320)
- September 2003 (331)
- August 2003 (287)
- July 2003 (323)
- June 2003 (332)
- May 2003 (433)
- 0 (1)
-
Categories
- Action Alert (31)
- Arts & Music (321)
- Astral Weather (13)
- Blind Justice (103)
- Blogosphere (95)
- Class War (151)
- Corporate Statism (366)
- Customer Service Hell (18)
- Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (380)
- Disastrous (7)
- Feature or Bug (3)
- Friday Fun (3)
- FUBAR (8)
- Fuck the Poor (117)
- Full Frontal Feminism (27)
- Geek Stuff (34)
- General (7397)
- Higher Ground (58)
- Humor (80)
- Imaginary Global Warming (37)
- Impeach This (53)
- IOKIYAR (76)
- Just a Goddamn Piece of Paper (58)
- Just Plain Crazy (30)
- Life in the Big City (14)
- Media (276)
- My So-Called Life (85)
- Oddball (23)
- Our Booming Economy (191)
- Paranoia Strikes Deep (13)
- Picture This (6)
- Pointless Crap (2)
- Politics As Usual (1221)
- Power to the People (57)
- Progress (3)
- Recession Depression (140)
- Republicans Are Good With Money (62)
- Star Talk (3)
- Terra Terra Terra! (49)
- The American Game (9)
- The Best Healthcare in the World (54)
- The Body Electric (69)
- The Regime (433)
- The Shadow Knows (50)
- Theocracy (57)
- War Crimes (111)
- War Stories (120)
- Whiny Ass Titty Babies (2)
- Why I'm Not A Catholic Anymore (2)
-
Tags
Add new tag Democratic Media political coverage polls primary race
-
Pages
You are a Working Class Warrior, also known as a blue-collar Democrat. You believe that the little guy is getting screwed by conservative greed-mongers and corporate criminals, and you’re not going to take it anymore.
Take the quiz at www.FightConservatives.com
accoustic guitar tuner @ HTTAG
Online Casino

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/?hpid=news-col-blog
“The advocates of a “gas tax holiday” are exaggerating the benefits to consumers from their proposal. If the Illinois experience is a guide, there is likely to be some reduction in the price of gas, but it would fall well short of the size of the tax reduction. In order to pay for the tax cut, the government would have to cut back on highway construction and maintenance or find some other way of plugging the shortfall in revenues to the Highway Trust Fund.”
The fact that the “gas tax holiday” proposal is the brainchild of John McCain, a man totally ignorant of economics, should have been the first tip off that it was a horrible idea.
Dean Baker:
Actually, almost all economists would agree that the tax cut proposed by Senators Clinton and McCain would save consumers nothing. With the supply of gas largely fixed by the capacity of the oil industry (they claim to be running their refineries at full capacity), the price will not change in response to the elimination of the tax. The only difference will be that money that used to go to the government in tax revenues will instead go to the oil industry as higher profits. (My emphasis)
As is typical of any conservative policy proposal, the people who benefit are the people who are the least in need of help.
It’s pandering, but that’s what she does. It’s an election so everything is fair game. You’ve got to go after those real voters, why people vote for people for all types of reasons and far be it for Hillary to say something like this:
you’re considering not voting for Senator because she’s a woman or Senator Obama because he’s black, you shouldn’t vote for me/i>
That kind of talk is for pansies.
The gas tax holdiday would temporarily eliminate the federal gas tax which is about $18-20 cents per gallon. It would mean very little savings to the average driver IMHO BUT it would not increase nor decrease nor have an effect on an oil company’s profits - don’t you people know anything? Jeez- talk about low information voters!
Wendy - Apparently you didn’t read the story I linked to. here’s part of what you missed:
‘Some economists say that a nationwide “gas tax holiday” would have even less impact on gas prices than temporary state moratoriums, such as the one passed by Illinois in 2000. “It’s basic economics,” said Leonard Burman, director of the Tax Policy Center, a non-partisan thinktank. “Gas is always in very short supply during the summer, which is why prices go up. In order to reduce the price, you would have to increase supply, but that is difficult over the short term, because the refineries cannot add capacity.”
James Hamilton, professor of Economics at the University of California-San Diego, said that most of the benefits from a temporary tax moratorium would likely go to producers rather than consumers. He said that states that suspend gas taxes are able to respond to rising demand more efficiently than the country as a whole, because gasoline supplies can be easily moved from one state to another.
“Prices would certainly rise to the market-clearing level,” said Hamilton. “I would expect the price [of gas] to go back to very close to where it was before [the tax cut], in which case consumers would not see any benefit.” ‘
Mmyself:
I generally skip over your comments with all due respect. And I have my doubts the Tax Policy Institute is “non-partisan”. And the UCSD prof is wrong too. FYI - I just got my 24th credit in economics I am proud to report.
In fact, I was simply responding to the hand-wringer who wrongly assumed a gas tax holiday would increase the oil company’s profits.
Wendy, while your immense pride in your 24 credits in economics is kinda cute, it doesn’t begin to compete with the experts. I assume you meant that as a joke?
The two I quoted here are not the only ones making this projection by any means. It is a fairly well studied and reported phenomenon.
No not being funny- suggest you learn to think for yourself. To do a takeoff on the cable commercial, 90% of the time I don’t believe 50% of what I read in the MSM. Got it?
Wow - you really do hold your 24 credit hours (8 whole courses) in high esteem. You have a great deal to learn. Many of us with far greater academic achievement do not believe our studies have made us so superior that our judgment automatically supersedes those of experts in the field.
By your comments, you do not appear to be really interested in learning for yourself. Your opinion is preset to the degree that you scorn the concept of reading opinions of those with much, much more experience and education than yourself. Any professors looking for any real in depth thinking rather than just memorizing and knee jerk reactions must find you quite the challenge.
Far greater academic achievements?? What makes you so sure your “so-called achievements” surpass mine? I hope you are not trying to count your advanced degree in some psuedo-science like sociology or philosophy.
no one who checks here regularly will confuse me with a wendy whiner supporter but I do respect and admire her determination to learn for herself. That’s nothing to knock.
Now ww - on to the issue at hand. It’s a bit complex and roundabout, but many mainstream economists do argue a tax holiday will lead to increased profits for oil companies:
http://firedoglake.com/2008/04/18/mccains-gas-tax-holiday-hurts-us-helps-oil-producers/
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/15/economists-weigh-mccains-gas-tax-plan/
And one simple argument: The public has already proven it will buy gas at level x – for the sake of argument we’ll say that’s $4.00 a gallon. Today the gas tax is suspended so next week you go fill up and gas now costs $3.82 a gallon - $.18 savings shows at pump. The next week it’s $3.86, the next $3.90, the next $3.93, etc. We have already proven a willingness to pay $4.00 a gallon for gas – the companies are aware of that and will use the opportunity to increase their profits.
The price is fixed by supply and demand. No gas rationing or price controls are on offer, nor would they be desirable.
The supply is limited by refinery capacity, already running at maximum, so supply isn’ t going up. That’s a hard constraint; perhaps refinery capacity can be increased, but it takes years (a decade?) to build a new refinery, so over the next few years SUPPLY IS FIXED.
How exactly is a gas tax holiday going to REDUCE demand? Because the only way that prices are going down is if the demand decreases or the supply goes up. If you didn’t learn THAT in 24 credits of econ, you should demand your money back.
With prices staying the same (what the consumer pays), supply staying the same (for which the producer pays), and the producer’s income = (price at pump) - (tax). The producer’s profit is (income)-(cost).
Reducing the tax without increasing the supply simply increases the producer’s income without changing the consumer’s cost or the producer’s cost, ergo it goes directly into profit.
I expect more disengenuous quibbling from WW, but the problem is that the facts and the economic theory (simple Chicago-style microeconomics, at that) are on the other side.
Yes, and nobody’s building any more refineries. Why? Because then they wouldn’t be able to say, “Oh, gee, we can’t make any more gas!”
Even on the face of it, the tax holiday is crap.
And no ad hominem attacks, please. And I apologize if I’ve ever done that myself.
“I hope you are not trying to count your advanced degree in some psuedo-science like sociology or philosophy”
Nope BS in Physics and a Masters in Business/ Engineering Management. I couldn’t even take my graduate level Econometrics class without the 24 credit hours of calculus, differential equations and partial differential equations I had completed.
… oh yeah and several professional certifications including two in finance.
Memyself:
Why do I think you are full of soup?