<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About Sid Blumenthal&#8217;s Emails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 09:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/#comment-142378</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24709#comment-142378</guid>
		<description>isn't this issue just "pure politics"?  in the past we were frequently reminded these are "politicians" and they in fact "play politics"...really just another flare shot up to distract media and blogs from discussing the reality of delegate math and probablities.  This week superD's continue to side with OB and the hrc team will (as politicians do) distract attention to something else...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t this issue just &#8220;pure politics&#8221;?  in the past we were frequently reminded these are &#8220;politicians&#8221; and they in fact &#8220;play politics&#8221;&#8230;really just another flare shot up to distract media and blogs from discussing the reality of delegate math and probablities.  This week superD&#8217;s continue to side with OB and the hrc team will (as politicians do) distract attention to something else&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayoustjohndavid</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/#comment-142352</link>
		<dc:creator>bayoustjohndavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24709#comment-142352</guid>
		<description>Also, I found that HuffPo link in an email that I sent to a friend as part of a discussion of the three most likely Democratic candidates.  If ,last May, two people who don't make their living in politics were already discussing whether Edwards or Obama or Clinton would be the best Democratic candidate, then Huffington trumpetted a hit piece on Clinton at the outset of what she already knew was likely to be a two or three candidate race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I found that HuffPo link in an email that I sent to a friend as part of a discussion of the three most likely Democratic candidates.  If ,last May, two people who don&#8217;t make their living in politics were already discussing whether Edwards or Obama or Clinton would be the best Democratic candidate, then Huffington trumpetted a hit piece on Clinton at the outset of what she already knew was likely to be a two or three candidate race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bayoustjohndavid</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/#comment-142348</link>
		<dc:creator>bayoustjohndavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24709#comment-142348</guid>
		<description>The HuffPo is going to condemn the Clinton campaign because Blumenthal sent out private emails with links to articles that criticize Obama?  That's really rich.  I took my name off the HuffPo's email list, because I didn't want to add to its readership stats, when &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/her-way-hillary_b_49733.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; appeared almost a year ago.  Private emails that mention anti-Obama articles are verboten, but blog posts trumpetting "Her Way" are just fine.  That post was the most featured link on that day's email, BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The HuffPo is going to condemn the Clinton campaign because Blumenthal sent out private emails with links to articles that criticize Obama?  That&#8217;s really rich.  I took my name off the HuffPo&#8217;s email list, because I didn&#8217;t want to add to its readership stats, when <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/her-way-hillary_b_49733.html" rel="nofollow">this post</a> appeared almost a year ago.  Private emails that mention anti-Obama articles are verboten, but blog posts trumpetting &#8220;Her Way&#8221; are just fine.  That post was the most featured link on that day&#8217;s email, BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: white_n_az</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/#comment-142347</link>
		<dc:creator>white_n_az</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24709#comment-142347</guid>
		<description>I thought the story was bs but when I read it at HuffPo, I peeked at the comments and wow...that is a collection of underfed psychos. It seemed much worse than the Orange Cheeto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the story was bs but when I read it at HuffPo, I peeked at the comments and wow&#8230;that is a collection of underfed psychos. It seemed much worse than the Orange Cheeto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sister of ye</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/#comment-142346</link>
		<dc:creator>sister of ye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24709#comment-142346</guid>
		<description>It amazes me how people who till now were heroes in left blogistan - Blumenthal and Paul Krugman, among others - are immediately considered vile, underhanded liar and conspirators the moment they say anything remotely negative about the Chosen One.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amazes me how people who till now were heroes in left blogistan - Blumenthal and Paul Krugman, among others - are immediately considered vile, underhanded liar and conspirators the moment they say anything remotely negative about the Chosen One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lambert Strether, Philadelphia, PA</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/02/20/23/about-sid-blumenthals-emails/#comment-142344</link>
		<dc:creator>Lambert Strether, Philadelphia, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24709#comment-142344</guid>
		<description>You  mean.... There's nothing to this story? But it was highly recommended at Kos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You  mean&#8230;. There&#8217;s nothing to this story? But it was highly recommended at Kos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
