Rules?? You mean hrc and co are now standing behind and supporting rules!?? LMAO!

now she claims “elitist opinion” is wrong…I’ll try to keep that in mind next time she is on a policy-wonk diatribe citing leading research and economists…even Krugman says she’s wrong on the gas tax holiday…pure pandering/pure clinton

Okay, using the rules of projection, somebody does have a dog in this fight, somebody’s getting paid to dismiss the votes of MI and FL, to show approval for bending the rules (100% of those votes disallowed, for the first time? really?), and to protect the money that might be behind this BHO process.

And, folks, it ain’t me.

My citation of a poll showing hrc positives was stated incorrectly. (did I mis-state or mis-speak?) here is the actual link: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/opinion/03blow.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

you like to flame out on commenting about my posts but curiously really never counter my pov…you are a fan of hrc and I am one for OB. it’s politics - I don’t have a dog in the fight - while you act as if you have money riding on this…I am merely a supporter of rules, votes, and the election process. If hrc was ahead and OB was throwing the sink I would support the rules like I am doing now. How do you think you would react if the shoe was on the other foot? you know…what would you be doing if OB was acting like hrc if he had no mathmatical chance of winning the delegates…? you may think you would support the rules of election and say he has every right to stay in the race…but I think we all know you and mr hrc would be purple faced, finger-waggin and untying panty knots all the live-long day…

Joe - don’t look now…

In the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, it’s Clinton 47% Obama 44%. That’s the third straight day that Clinton has held a slight edge over Obama

that’s the sound of your guy tanking…11 point drop in less than a week.

New polling in New Hampshire shows that Clinton has gained ground on McCain in the Granite State while Obama is heading in the opposite direction.”

that’s typical of what is happening to Obama everywhere…

I thought the Dems actually wanted to win the presidential election this year

The same is true for Barack Obama (and you have his initials backward), although I worry that the Bradley effect may hurt him when we get to the general–assuming that he gets the nomination.

How about spend your time validating why hrc feels OB is unelectable because he can’t win low income white voters east of the Mississippi (appalachia) but she is somehow electable while losing the AA, educated white, mid-high income white, and indies voters (except in Ark, Mass, Ok and RI)??? She lost those blocs in all other states…(iirc)

Atrios says: “I was going to ignore it until Drudge posted it, but stupid me anyway.”

NOTE I’m actually thinking that a “working toward Obama” attitude might be at the root of it all. We are dealing with a movement, here, after all, even if the movement is, at this point, about nothing other than jobs for the Boiz.

Yeah, the shift starts at 9AM sharp, doesn’t it? I did the two fingers thing to a teacher once, and he noticed. Boy, was he pissed! To matters of substance:

Susie, here are some questions that oddly, or not, aren’t being addressed. (The links are in my main post here).

1. Who blogwhored the video to the A list? Amato, in his critique, says “a good friend.” Atrios says he “should have waited for Drudge.” Why didn’t he? The second question is related:

2. Why would any A lister accept the video uncritically? A transcript (at least for the Kantor “nigger” smear) only came later; and if the video had any provenance at all, it wasn’t exposed in the postings. Surely some sort of checking was done on something so potentially controversial? (And something, as well, that also may have involved copyright material?)

3. Who’s the video “editor” and why won’t they come forward? Ben Smith quotes the “editor” of the video(s)* who says (a) they are an Obama supporter and (b) the Obama campaign has nothing to do with the matter yet (c) the Obama campaign has, so far, issued a non-denial denial. There seems to be no reason to take any of this on trust.

4. Is the video “editor” JedReport, prominent Kos poster, Obama supporter, and former Hill staffer?

5. Why isn’t a “dirty trick” news? ABC’s Tapper calls the episode a “dirty trick” — and it’s hard to think of another word for faking the word “nigger” into a video, attributing it to a prominent Clinton supporter, and releasing it immediately before a crucial set of primaries.

I’m sure there are other questions, but these are the ones that come to mind now.

* There also seem to be several.

but have you seen the part of the video where kantor scratches his face with his middle two fingers????