<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dueling Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/05/09/15/dueling-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/05/09/15/dueling-polls/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: snuzy mandrake</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/05/09/15/dueling-polls/#comment-142479</link>
		<dc:creator>snuzy mandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24734#comment-142479</guid>
		<description>actually, i don't think the polls are really that inconsistent with each other. the biggest different seems to be the spin each article is placing on their respective data. for example, the u.s.a. today poll (the one that supposedly shows that obama's standing has "been significantly damaged" by the wright kerfuffle, showed &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-04-polltable_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip" rel="nofollow"&gt;no significant change&lt;/a&gt; in obama's favorability/unfavorability rating in the past month (it went from 60%/34% to 58%/37% with a MOE of +/-3%)

the wright-specific questions in each poll are very different from one another (u.s.a. today asks more questions whereas the NYT/CBS polls just has respondents state whether they think the controversy will affect anyone's votes in the fall)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, i don&#8217;t think the polls are really that inconsistent with each other. the biggest different seems to be the spin each article is placing on their respective data. for example, the u.s.a. today poll (the one that supposedly shows that obama&#8217;s standing has &#8220;been significantly damaged&#8221; by the wright kerfuffle, showed <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-04-polltable_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip" rel="nofollow">no significant change</a> in obama&#8217;s favorability/unfavorability rating in the past month (it went from 60%/34% to 58%/37% with a MOE of +/-3%)</p>
<p>the wright-specific questions in each poll are very different from one another (u.s.a. today asks more questions whereas the NYT/CBS polls just has respondents state whether they think the controversy will affect anyone&#8217;s votes in the fall)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: campbell</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/05/09/15/dueling-polls/#comment-142476</link>
		<dc:creator>campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24734#comment-142476</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good work.
Campbell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work.<br />
Campbell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
