http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/15/13/36/ready-to-fight/ Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:00:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/15/13/36/ready-to-fight/#comment-143467 k Thu, 15 May 2008 22:01:17 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24861#comment-143467 Okay, I don't get any connection between the results of a Rasmussen poll and the War room. Do you think this stay-on-the-message center is working? Will it end with a legion of drones in lock-step, like the Republican Party? Or is that what Obama is trying to do? Like the t-shirt says, if I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution. Okay, I don’t get any connection between the results of a Rasmussen poll and the War room.
Do you think this stay-on-the-message center is working? Will it end with a legion of drones in lock-step, like the Republican Party?
Or is that what Obama is trying to do? Like the t-shirt says, if I can’t dance, I don’t want to be part of your revolution.

]]> http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/15/13/36/ready-to-fight/#comment-143412 Zon Thu, 15 May 2008 18:33:40 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24861#comment-143412 There is no way that I can see Clinton running as an independent. Whatever else you may think of Bill & Hillary Clinton, they have been committed to the Democratic party and have no major policy differences with the party. Running as an independent could make sense for a candidate who has an important ideological point to make. But running as an independent against someone who basically shares the same policy platform just makes no sense at all. I can't believe she would be stupid enough to do that, and no, I would certainly not support that. (Speaking as just one person who voted for Clinton.) There is no way that I can see Clinton running as an independent. Whatever else you may think of Bill & Hillary Clinton, they have been committed to the Democratic party and have no major policy differences with the party. Running as an independent could make sense for a candidate who has an important ideological point to make. But running as an independent against someone who basically shares the same policy platform just makes no sense at all. I can’t believe she would be stupid enough to do that, and no, I would certainly not support that. (Speaking as just one person who voted for Clinton.)

]]> http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/15/13/36/ready-to-fight/#comment-143411 James Guglielmino Thu, 15 May 2008 18:21:36 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24861#comment-143411 Makeit 29%. Typo. Sorry Makeit 29%. Typo. Sorry

]]> http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/15/13/36/ready-to-fight/#comment-143410 James Guglielmino Thu, 15 May 2008 18:20:46 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24861#comment-143410 Let's see how much you like her if the poll done by Rasmussen predicts anything. 20% of those polled wanted her to run as an independent if (when) the Democratic nomination goes to Obama. So, you who like her, would she do that? And if she does, will you still like her? Gug Let’s see how much you like her if the poll done by Rasmussen predicts anything. 20% of those polled wanted her to run as an independent if (when) the Democratic nomination goes to Obama. So, you who like her, would she do that? And if she does, will you still like her?
Gug

]]>