Comments on: That Horrible, Horrible Woman http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/16/09/30/that-horrible-horrible-woman/ Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:14:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Macjazz http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/16/09/30/that-horrible-horrible-woman/#comment-143559 Macjazz Fri, 16 May 2008 23:03:41 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24877#comment-143559 "I for one can point to this post as the start of my misogynistic views: http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/14/15/44/i-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-for-president/" Ouch! Now that's gonna leave a mark! “I for one can point to this post as the start of my misogynistic views:
http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/14/15/44/i-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-for-president/”

Ouch! Now that’s gonna leave a mark!

]]> By: willieMT http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/16/09/30/that-horrible-horrible-woman/#comment-143556 willieMT Fri, 16 May 2008 22:16:04 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24877#comment-143556 Maybe you should attack Larry Johnson for this assault on Michelle Obama http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/16/will-barack-throw-mama-from-the-train/ Maybe you should attack Larry Johnson for this assault on Michelle Obama
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/16/will-barack-throw-mama-from-the-train/

]]> By: Stuart http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/16/09/30/that-horrible-horrible-woman/#comment-143544 Stuart Fri, 16 May 2008 18:14:46 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24877#comment-143544 I for one can point to this post as the start of my misogynistic views: http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/14/15/44/i-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-for-president/ Why people like these are allowed to post at all are beyond me. Dammed misogynists ought to be strung up! I for one can point to this post as the start of my misogynistic views:
http://susiemadrak.com/2008/01/14/15/44/i-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-for-president/

Why people like these are allowed to post at all are beyond me. Dammed misogynists ought to be strung up!

]]> By: David Parsons http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/16/09/30/that-horrible-horrible-woman/#comment-143536 David Parsons Fri, 16 May 2008 16:50:45 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24877#comment-143536 If you're one of the people who's been running about calling Ms. Clinton the antichrist and insulting her as a woman, which would you prefer to be called? Given the choice between (a) insecure and (b) being a misogynist, I'd think that choosing (a) would be much less insulting. (If, on the other hand, you are a misogynist, why not just come out and admit it? There appear to be plenty of misogynists in the Obamasphere, so you wouldn't be alone in your pathetic bigotry.) If you’re one of the people who’s been running about calling Ms. Clinton the antichrist and insulting her as a woman, which would you prefer to be called? Given the choice between (a) insecure and (b) being a misogynist, I’d think that choosing (a) would be much less insulting.

(If, on the other hand, you are a misogynist, why not just come out and admit it? There appear to be plenty of misogynists in the Obamasphere, so you wouldn’t be alone in your pathetic bigotry.)

]]> By: unclemike http://susiemadrak.com/2008/05/16/09/30/that-horrible-horrible-woman/#comment-143535 unclemike Fri, 16 May 2008 16:11:30 +0000 http://susiemadrak.com/?p=24877#comment-143535 Well, so nice of Lance to tell me what I'm <i>really</i> thinking. Well, so nice of Lance to tell me what I’m really thinking.

]]>