<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uh Huh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/</link>
	<description>Keeping a jaundiced eye on the corporate media.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Gall</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146371</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146371</guid>
		<description>I have as much confidence that churches will do the right thing as I have that Bush will or most any other politicians.  And that is none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have as much confidence that churches will do the right thing as I have that Bush will or most any other politicians.  And that is none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146369</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146369</guid>
		<description>Part of Digby's response to Greenwald's post.
"Money is fungible. Catholic charities using "government money" for child care but using "their own" money to discriminate in other areas is an accounting method not a meaningful distinction."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of Digby&#8217;s response to Greenwald&#8217;s post.<br />
&#8220;Money is fungible. Catholic charities using &#8220;government money&#8221; for child care but using &#8220;their own&#8221; money to discriminate in other areas is an accounting method not a meaningful distinction.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146368</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146368</guid>
		<description>You know, that whole "You can't discriminate against people" is such a crock of shit. Prove that that really happens in real life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, that whole &#8220;You can&#8217;t discriminate against people&#8221; is such a crock of shit. Prove that that really happens in real life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendancalling</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146365</link>
		<dc:creator>brendancalling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146365</guid>
		<description>update this post please: according to atrios, &lt;a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/obama_speech_we_can_expand_fai.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;TPM&lt;/a&gt;, and several other sites, the AP is wrong.

&lt;blockquote&gt;"Now, make no mistake, as someone who used to teach constitutional law, I believe deeply in the separation of church and state, but I don't believe this partnership will endanger that idea - so long as we follow a few basic principles. &lt;b&gt;First, if you get a federal grant, you can't use that grant money to proselytize to the people you help and you can't discriminate against them - or against the people you hire - on the basis of their religion&lt;/b&gt;. Second, federal dollars that go directly to churches, temples, and mosques &lt;b&gt;can only be used on secular programs&lt;/b&gt;. And we'll also ensure that taxpayer dollars only go to those programs that actually work."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

update please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>update this post please: according to atrios, <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/obama_speech_we_can_expand_fai.php" rel="nofollow">TPM</a>, and several other sites, the AP is wrong.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Now, make no mistake, as someone who used to teach constitutional law, I believe deeply in the separation of church and state, but I don&#8217;t believe this partnership will endanger that idea - so long as we follow a few basic principles. <b>First, if you get a federal grant, you can&#8217;t use that grant money to proselytize to the people you help and you can&#8217;t discriminate against them - or against the people you hire - on the basis of their religion</b>. Second, federal dollars that go directly to churches, temples, and mosques <b>can only be used on secular programs</b>. And we&#8217;ll also ensure that taxpayer dollars only go to those programs that actually work.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>update please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146364</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146364</guid>
		<description>http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/07/01/faith/index.html

Can we hold off on feeding frenzies until a few facts are checked??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/07/01/faith/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/07/01/faith/index.html</a></p>
<p>Can we hold off on feeding frenzies until a few facts are checked??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Izquierdo</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146363</link>
		<dc:creator>Izquierdo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146363</guid>
		<description>OK, if you had to choose just  one, would it be:
Barack Obama
- or - 
A Barium Enema?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, if you had to choose just  one, would it be:<br />
Barack Obama<br />
- or -<br />
A Barium Enema?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146357</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146357</guid>
		<description>Susie--have some more kool-aid--that might help!  Mine is spiked with tequila, and it's yummy super-delicious!  

Gee, some of us had this guy pegged months ago--but it was much more important to "beat the bitch."  Well done, Dems!  You let the media select our candidate instead of the voters, so get out those big happy-face masks, you're going to need them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susie&#8211;have some more kool-aid&#8211;that might help!  Mine is spiked with tequila, and it&#8217;s yummy super-delicious!  </p>
<p>Gee, some of us had this guy pegged months ago&#8211;but it was much more important to &#8220;beat the bitch.&#8221;  Well done, Dems!  You let the media select our candidate instead of the voters, so get out those big happy-face masks, you&#8217;re going to need them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbd</title>
		<link>http://susiemadrak.com/2008/07/01/06/32/uh-huh-13/#comment-146350</link>
		<dc:creator>lbd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://susiemadrak.com/?p=25527#comment-146350</guid>
		<description>Disgusting, but not surprising.  Since the beginning of his Senate career, he has always made strong statements supporting evangelical positions.  I wonder what this means for our school science curricula (not to mention, his nominations for the Supreme Court).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgusting, but not surprising.  Since the beginning of his Senate career, he has always made strong statements supporting evangelical positions.  I wonder what this means for our school science curricula (not to mention, his nominations for the Supreme Court).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
