Feb 21st, 2012 at 6:06 pm by susie
I’m sitting, staring at the glass of uck in front of me. I suppose the best solution is to hold my breath and gulp it quick.
UPDATE: Okay, that wasn’t so awful. It just tastes like baking soda and water.
UPDATE: The active ingredient is what they use in eye drops and in various manufacturing processes. Yay.
Feb 21st, 2012 at 5:50 pm by susie
Feb 21st, 2012 at 5:39 pm by susie
Feb 21st, 2012 at 4:38 pm by susie
Tuesday, Feb 21 | 9 pm eastern | 6 pm pacific |Virtually Speaking Tuesdays | As it is the 3rd Tuesday, Avedon Carol andCorrentewire‘s Lambert Strether dissect breaking news and crazy liberalism. Plus a brand new Z File from Stuart Zechman. Follow @Avedon_Says @CorrenteWire Listen live and later on BTR.
Feb 21st, 2012 at 3:56 pm by susie
Interesting column from David Sirota about people criticizing Chris Christie for lowering state flags after the death of Whitney Houston:
Of course, when singer Frank Sinatra died and New Jersey’s flags were flown at half-staff, this kind of outrage was nowhere to be found — despite the fact that Sinatra himself was a drug abuser (the drug in question beingalcohol). Likewise, the outrage was nowhere to be found when Elvis Presley died of a drug overdose in 1977 and flags all over America were flown at half-staff. Indeed, as the Rockford Register Star’s Chuck Sweeneynotes, that event prompted an order for “all city flags in Memphis (to be) lowered to half staff”; compelled former President Richard Nixon to “ask Americans to fly their flags at half staff in honor of Elvis”; and got then-President Jimmy Carter to issue a statement saying, “With Elvis, a part of our country has died.”
What, then, explains the difference? Why would there be a hostile reaction to the way New Jersey memorialized the drug-abusing Houston, when there was no such hostile reaction to the way the drug-abusing Sinatra and Presley were memorialized?
The answer, of course, is rooted, in part, in racist and sexist double standards.
When famous white men engage in illicit activities, American culture allows them to nonetheless retain their street cred, their wholesome image and their public honor. In some instances, in fact, the illicit behavior contributes to their mystique and their legacy — it is seen as acool part of who they are. This is exactly why one of the iconic images of Sinatra is him in a tux with a highball in his hand — because a white, male-dominated culture accepts — and even at times celebrates — the blemishes of fellow white men.
Continue Reading »
Feb 21st, 2012 at 3:19 pm by susie
Barack Obama! Even though he hasn’t done a thing to control guns, he gets accused of it anyway, because that’s how your basic paranoid wingnut thinks:
Although the nation’s largest gun lobby would never publicly acknowledge it, at least one gun-loving group seems to realize that a Democratic president isn’t always bad for business.
In a post published Tuesday by online ammunition supplier Ammo.com, President Barack Obama is hailed as “the greatest gun salesman in America.”
The site is even asking readers whether the gun industry should actually begin supporting him.
In an eye-grabbing message, the munitions outlet compiled dozens of statistics that show firearms sales skyrocketing in the wake of Obama’s 2008 election.
“Ironically, the perceived hostility towards gun owners by President Obama has actually helped the firearms industry tremendously,” they wrote. “Since the 2008 election, more Americans than ever before are purchasing firearms & ammunition. This has meant massive increases in sales by firearm & ammunition makers, billions more in federal and state tax collections related to guns & ammo, increased membership in the [National Rifle Association (NRA)], and hundreds of thousands of new Americans carrying concealed handguns. Therefore, should the firearms industry support President Obama for a second term or not?”
That’s actually a good question — although it’s not being taken seriously by the NRA.
During the recent Conservative Political Action Conference, NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre declared Obama’s lack of interest in gun regulations to be part of “a massive Obama conspiracy.”
Continue Reading »
Feb 21st, 2012 at 2:15 pm by susie
If you don’t count money (which is how people with no creative talent keep score), he’s what I think of as a classic loser in the game of life. No spouse, no children, workaholic, kicked out of his professional organization for ethical violations, no standards to speak of, bad toupee. I’m guessing he has to pay for sex. He’s the kind of person who makes other people feel good, because everyone can find something about this scumbag to make themselves feel superior. Isn’t it interesting, that any news organizations treat him like he’s credible? Because he’s not just on Fox News.
And now, he jokes about killing the president. Isn’t he just too special?
Fox News contributor Frank Luntz on Monday made a suggestion about running over the nation’s first black president with his car.
Appearing at an event with Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum in West Michigan, the GOP pollster warmed up the audience with a few jokes. Video of the event was captured by The Grand Rapids Press.
“I actually have a ‘Run, Barack, Run’ bumper sticker, but I put it on the front of my car,” Luntz said.
He told another joke about McDonald’s “Obama Happy Meal,” where you “order anything you want and guy behind you has to pay for it.”
Luntz also poked fun at former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for living in Chappaqua, N.Y.
“Did you know that Chappaqua is Indian for separate bedrooms?” he asked the crowd.
Feb 21st, 2012 at 1:57 pm by susie
Feb 21st, 2012 at 12:49 pm by susie
Feb 21st, 2012 at 11:25 am by susie
Nope, no evil incentives to arrest people there! Via Smirking Chimp, Jayne Lyn Stahl:
Last week Reader Supported News reported that a giant private prison company, Corrections Corporations of America, has approached virtually every state in the union with the offer that they’d buy up their prisons, and “manage convicted criminals at a cost-savings.”
What better time for such an offer, too, when states like California are releasing many minor offenders for lack of money, but a closer look shows that this kind of offer is not unlike a leveraged buyout of federal and state prisons, but with one obvious caveat: per Reader Supported News, too, the company in this case, Corrections Corporations of America, is demanding a 20 year contract. And, more importantly, prisons must be delivered 90% full. 90% full of what, you might ask, of human “product.” Inmates are the assets at the root of prison privatization.
CCA has already devoted $250 million to this so-called prison management venture which is, in reality, not unlike the reconstruction deals awarded to Halliburton after the occupation in Iraq. The independent contractors earn just as much revenue as the parent company.
1 in 100 Americans are behind bars as the New York Times has reported. The U.S. has the highest incarceration rate of any country in the world. That number is bound to grow when more companies like Corrections Corporations of America get a whiff of all the money to be made in this industry.
This is nothing new, of course, former vice-president, Dick Cheney’s Vanguard Group, while dealing in mutual funds, has famously found a breeding ground for investor money in private prisons for the past several years.
What’s the difference between what CCA is doing, and what Vanguard and other companies that deal in privatizing prisons have done?
Continue Reading »