In case you were wondering, protesters are repeating everything he says because they’ve been told they’re not permitted to use microphones or megaphones:
Matt Taibbi explains why it’s accurate to think of crooked investment bankers — banksters — as scam artists as well as degenerate gamblers…
I left this comment on this NPR post yesterday morning about why they weren’t covering Occupy Wall Street (too small, no celebrities, etc.):
Thank you for sticking to your guns on your business model.
Every time NPR decides not to cover growing political movements, I invariably get a large contribution to my blog from someone saying, “I used to make a contribution to NPR, but because of (fill in the blank), I’m giving the money to you instead.” I hear this a lot: “Why give them money for news I read about on your blog months ago?” Also, that “he said, she said” thing? Keep that up, too.
Love, Your Competition
Ginia Bellafante should have been fired or reassigned to work for the fashion section. Instead, I’ll bet she was high-fived by her yuppie colleagues for writing this fashionably snide article…
For some reason, people never seem to want to pay attention to the fact that maybe our votes don’t matter:
The Vulnerability Assessment Team (VAT) at the U.S. Dept. of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois has managed to hack a Diebold Accuvote touch-screen voting machine in what I describe at my exclusive today at Salon as perhaps “one of the most disturbing e-voting machine hacks to date.”
As noted by the computer scientists and security experts at Argonne’s VAT, largely all that’s needed to accomplish this hack is about $26 and an 8th grade science education.
“This is a national security issue,” VAT team leader Roger Johnston told me, echoing what I’ve been reporting other computer scientists and security experts telling me for years. “It should really be handled by the Department of Homeland Security.”
Johnston should know. While the VAT folks have been dabbling in the security (or lack thereof) of e-voting systems in their spare time of late, most of the work they do is related to issues like nuclear safeguards and non-proliferation.
What makes this hack so troubling — and different from those which have come before it — is that it doesn’t require any actual changes to, or even knowledge of, the voting system software or its memory card programming. It’s not a cyberattack. It’s a “Man-in-the-middle” attack where a tiny, $10.50 piece of electronics is inserted into the system between the voter and the main circuit board of the voting system allowing for complete control over the touch-screen system and the entire voting process along with it.
Add an optional $15 radio frequency remote control device, and votes can be changed, without the knowledge of the voter, from up to half a mile away…