Some thoughts on Russell Brand

Beauty Vamp Castle

I thought this was a perfect summation of the kind of crap I hate from so-called “progressive” and liberal types. I can’t tell you how much they annoy the shit out of me. Even though he’s talking specifically about the British left, read his description of the Vampire Castle — it’s right on. Mark Fisher:

This summer, I seriously considered withdrawing from any involvement in politics. Exhausted through overwork, incapable of productive activity, I found myself drifting through social networks, feeling my depression and exhaustion increasing.

‘Left-wing’ Twitter can often be a miserable, dispiriting zone. Earlier this year, there were some high-profile twitterstorms, in which particular left-identifying figures were ‘called out’ and condemned. What these figures had said was sometimes objectionable; but nevertheless, the way in which they were personally vilified and hounded left a horrible residue: the stench of bad conscience and witch-hunting moralism. The reason I didn’t speak out on any of these incidents, I’m ashamed to say, was fear. The bullies were in another part of the playground. I didn’t want to attract their attention to me.

The open savagery of these exchanges was accompanied by something more pervasive, and for that reason perhaps more debilitating: an atmosphere of snarky resentment. The most frequent object of this resentment is Owen Jones, and the attacks on Jones – the person most responsible for raising class consciousness in the UK in the last few years – were one of the reasons I was so dejected. If this is what happens to a left-winger who is actually succeeding in taking the struggle to the centre ground of British life, why would anyone want to follow him into the mainstream? Is the only way to avoid this drip-feed of abuse to remain in a position of impotent marginality?

One of the things that broke me out of this depressive stupor was going to the People’s Assembly in Ipswich, near where I live. The People’s Assembly had been greeted with the usual sneers and snarks. This was, we were told, a useless stunt, in which media leftists, including Jones, were aggrandising themselves in yet another display of top-down celebrity culture. What actually happened at the Assembly in Ipswich was very different to this caricature. The first half of the evening – culminating in a rousing speech by Owen Jones – was certainly led by the top-table speakers. But the second half of the meeting saw working class activists from all over Suffolk talking to each other, supporting one another, sharing experiences and strategies. Far from being another example of hierarchical leftism, the People’s Assembly was an example of how the vertical can be combined with the horizontal: media power and charisma could draw people who hadn’t previously been to a political meeting into the room, where they could talk and strategise with seasoned activists. The atmosphere was anti-racist and anti-sexist, but refreshingly free of the paralysing feeling of guilt and suspicion which hangs over left-wing twitter like an acrid, stifling fog.

Then there was Russell Brand. I’ve long been an admirer of Brand – one of the few big-name comedians on the current scene to come from a working class background. Over the last few years, there has been a gradual but remorseless embourgeoisement of television comedy, with preposterous ultra-posh nincompoop Michael McIntyre and a dreary drizzle of bland graduate chancers dominating the stage.
Continue reading “Some thoughts on Russell Brand”

Pre-snow insanity

trying to get home

I really did have to get a few things, so I thought this might be a good morning to go downtown and use my Trader Joe’s gift certificate. Hah! The line waiting out on the street to get into the parking lot was blocking a major intersection. So I decided to go back to my neighborhood ShopRite instead. I drove down Spring Garden Street to get home, and was greeted by GIANT CLOUDS of salt mixed with sand. The salt got into my car vents and made my eyes burn.

At the ShopRite? There was nowhere to park, nowhere at all.
Continue reading “Pre-snow insanity”

‘The torture is for the torture’

Witness Torture Rally

Shaker Aamer is the last British resident in Guantanamo Bay, and writes about his torturous treatment. But this is the part that jumped out at me:

I met the new doctor. He is no different than any of the other doctors – different dancer, same club. He certainly dances to the same tune as his predecessors. He came to see me recently. It was even the same song. “I am your new doctor. If you need any help, ask for me.” I told him he is not a doctor but a tool in the colonel’s hand. He said, “No I am not.” So I said I would give him a little test. I reminded him of my arthritis and rheumatism, and said I needed a blanket to keep out the air conditioning that they run so cold here. He said, “That is not my job, I am here to give you medication.” I told him that a real doctor would care about my health, not just give me pills. But he did not want to listen, and he left.

They are not doctors, they are navy personnel; they follow orders, not their medical ethics. The system is for the system. The torture is for the torture.

Clemency for Edward Snowden

IMG_0959-1 Wall Art
The NYT editorialized about Snowden yesterday, saying he deserved a much lighter punishment in light of his whistleblower status. The Atlantic responds to pushback from Business Insider’s Josh Barro:

Where this goes wrong is imagining that a plea bargain or some form of clemency (or even a presidential pardon) for Snowden would set a precedent or legitimize a general rule of any kind. It would not. The concepts of pardon and clemency are part our system precisely because there are instances when applying rules we’ve generally decided upon would be unjust and counterproductive. They are meant to be used judiciously, on an ad hoc basis, in what are clearly exceptional circumstances.

Snowden’s leak meets those tests. Urging clemency for Snowden is not a radical case against our existing system of rules–it is an acknowledgment that, like all rules, ours are imperfect. One of the finest presidents, George Washington, pardoned farmers who took up arms against the federal government (!) to protest a tax on whiskey. He wouldn’t have granted those pardons had he thought that he was making a radical case against the legitimacy of the U.S. government or setting a precedent for anti-tax insurrections. And it is difficult to argue that any such precedent was set, even at the dawn of the federal republic when norms were still being established.
Continue reading “Clemency for Edward Snowden”

Criminally insane Florida man stopped with 36 guns

dunaway

This is why I love Florida. They really go to the wall to protect our constitutional freedoms!

TAMPA — A man who shot a trucker to death in 1992 but was judged to be criminally insane seemed nervous Saturday when stopped for speeding east of Gainesville, a deputy reported.

David Harris Dunaway, 58, was wanted by federal authorities, the deputy learned. A grand jury in Tampa had indicted him on a gun charge Dec. 18, alleging that he had a pistol and 50 rounds of ammunition, illegal for someone with Dunaway’s medical history.

But in a search of his green Honda van, the deputy found more — 36 guns, 4,629 rounds.

Dunaway of Hawthorne reported that he was headed to the Waldo flea market to sell “some” of his personal collection, according to Alachua County sheriff’s spokesman Art Forgey.

I’m sure there’s a valid constitutional argument to be made. I just can’t think of one.

H/T Kush Arora.

I am so shocked

Wildfires

I don’t exactly expect the Democrats to be much better, but I hope I’m wrong. Maybe we need some pitchforks!

A new study published in Nature suggests that climate change is even worse than scientists had previously anticipated, upgrading the forecast from “dangerous” to “catastrophic.” According to the study’s authors, temperatures are currently snared in an upward spiral: As earth gets hotter, the heat prevents sunlight-reflecting clouds from forming, trapping more heat and further exacerbating the problem. The result could be a temperature climb of 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100.

The alarming report follows yet another confirmation, this time by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, that humans are almost indubitably the drivers of climate change. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has expressed concern, stating that “if this isn’t an alarm bell, then I don’t know what one is. If ever there were an issue that demanded greater cooperation, partnership, and committed diplomacy, this is it.”

But the unnerving escalaton in climate change is unlikely to be abated without significant U.S. support—and for the time being, the Republican Party insists on stonewalling any efforts to offset the human-caused warming process. Given that the U.S. is the second biggest contributor to climate change, its participation in any international resolution is absolutely vital. Yet with one major political party blocking such support, the odds seem increasingly likely that 2100 will, indeed, bring with it a “catastrophic” increase of global heat.