13 March 2012 ~ Comments Off

Santorum — ‘stealth lobbyist’ or shill?

The headline alone was enough to make me laugh: “Santorum accuses Fox News of shilling for Romney.” This is like Madonna accusing a rival diva of lip-synching. More here.

Continue Reading

09 March 2012 ~ 1 Comment

Serfs don’t need no schoolin’

Uneducated = ignorant and apathetic, which is just fine with Romney and his cronies


By Odd Man Out
Yes, it’s true that college education isn’t for everybody, and that the need for trades people of all sorts is as important as the need for college-educated workers. But the ruling class’s antipathy to public education is about more than this. More here.

Continue Reading

27 February 2012 ~ 1 Comment

Class warfare? It’s only just begun

How did we sink to where less than 12 percent of workers are represented by unions? To where the corporate media allows perversely false phrases such as “right to work” to enter the language? More here.

Continue Reading

23 February 2012 ~ 2 Comments

Mitt flips, tells truth

As David Dayen points out, one of the perils of non-stop flip-flopping is you might make a statement that’s fact-based and therefore likely to get you into trouble with the Republican “base.” For example, a statement addressing the truth about spending cuts.

Continue Reading

15 February 2012 ~ Comments Off

Mitt, they see through you

Even Mitt’s millions might not be able to help him in the Michigan primary, where voters know he would have let the big auto companies go bankrupt. More here.

Continue Reading

06 February 2012 ~ Comments Off

Madonna exits, Mitt marches on

The concepts are unintentionally funny, the players about as exciting as a squad of assembly-line robots. More here.

Continue Reading

04 February 2012 ~ 1 Comment

Central Government for Dummies

Tea Partiers are so ignorant they don’t seem to know what Ben Franklin meant when he used a snake as a symbol to rally colonists into uniting against a common enemy. More here.

Continue Reading

02 February 2012 ~ Comments Off

Mitt buys inevitability

The NYT probably will run a 2,000-word analysis on how Mitt Romney “turned it around” in Florida, but all we need to know about that primary is in this paragraph from a piece by Charles Pierce:

…Romney won because he had the most money. And because he had the most money, enough of the Tea Party “base,” which was supposed to hate him like gum disease, decided thusly: What the hell? The important thing is to get the Muslim Kenyan Usurper Negro out of the White House, so this is the horse we have to ride. There were something like 13,000 commercials aired in Florida over the past couple of weeks. Ninety-two percent of them were negative, the overwhelming number of which said negative things about N. Leroy Gingrich, Definer of Civilization’s Rules and Leader (Perhaps) of the Civilizing Forces, on behalf of the man who told us on Tuesday night that we should follow him into the old America of hope and joy and not bumper stickers. That is how you win the Inevitability Primary. You buy Inevitability. It doesn’t come cheaply…

Continue Reading

02 February 2012 ~ Comments Off

Tuning out Newt’s noise

One Randy California guitar solo is worth more than a thousand political campaign speeches:

Continue Reading

02 February 2012 ~ Comments Off

Newt’s new-found concern

Newt Gingrich is upset — downright indignant, it seems — because Mitt Romney is “not concerned about the very poor.” Even Jim DeMint is upset with Mittens.

Right. If you believe this, I know some hot new housing developments in Florida you’ll want to invest in.

From ThinkProgress:

…Despite all their new-found concern for the middle class and the poor, all three Republicans — Romney, Gingrich, and DeMint — support policies that would substantially undermine safety net programs and result in massive giveaways to upper-income earners and investors, while doing almost nothing for middle- and low-income Americans.

Continue Reading