I do believe hell has frozen over. First Alan Greenspan admits his ideological beliefs were wrong, he’s now telling the Republicans it would be “disastrous” to extend the Bush tax cuts without paying for them, thus attacking the centerpiece of their dogma (that tax cuts pay for themselves):
Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan said that the push by congressional Republicans to extend the Bush tax cuts without offsetting the costs elsewhere could end up being “disastrous” for the economy.
In an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Greenspan expressed his disagreement with the conservative argument that tax cuts essentially pay for themselves by generating revenue and productivity among recipients.
“They do not,” said Greenspan.
“I’m very much in favor of tax cuts but not with borrowed money and the problem that we have gotten into in recent years is spending programs with borrowed money, tax cuts with borrowed money,” he said. “And at the end of the day that proves disastrous. My view is I don’t think we can play subtle policy here.”
The comments from the former Fed chief were an elaboration of a position he outlined in an interview earlier in the week. Speaking with PBS’ Judy Woodruff, Greenspan expressed his opposition to passing legislation that would hold tax rates steady (under law the tax cuts Bush passed ten years ago are going to expire, thereby bringing rates back to Clinton-era levels). President Obama has pledged to continue the tax breaks for those individuals making under $200,000 and those families earning less than $250,000.
But Republicans want the entire package kept in place. Even so, they have declined to say how they would pay for it, saying, in part, that keeping the Bush tax cuts in place will pay for itself.
In addition to throwing cold water on that theory, Greenspan also weighed in on broader economic issues and trends. The former Fed Chairman relayed some sobering economic predictions, saying he expected the nation’s unemployment rate to remain at its current level, mainly because there were few tools left to change it.
Greenspan is still an arrogant louse. You have to consider the whole statement(s):
extend the Bush tax cuts without offsetting the costs elsewhere could end up being “disastrous” …
…disagreement with the conservative argument that tax cuts essentially pay for themselves by generating revenue and productivity among recipients… “I’m very much in favor of tax cuts but not with borrowed money and the problem that we have gotten into in recent years is spending programs with borrowed money, tax cuts with borrowed money,” he said. “And at the end of the day that proves disastrous. My view is I don’t think we can play subtle policy here.”
What would be cut to pay for the tax cut? He doesn’t say directly. He hasn’t really changed his spots.
He’s never going to be a liberal. But he’s actually admitting Ayn Rand was wrong!
Maybe only two ghosts visited him at midnight, instead of the customary three.