What is measured in Michelle Rhee’s bogus state report card?

No one who actually knows anything about education believes a word this woman says, but unfortunately the hedge fund billionaires think she’s God:

I quote from the report in black, bold, and add some comments in red italics.

Objectives combined for SPRC Scoring :

■ Reduce legal barriers to entry into teaching profession and permit alternate certification programs to provisionally place teachers in the classroom (In other words, make a 5-week summer program like TFA, or no program at all, the legal equivalent to a traditional one- or two-year professional teaching license system.)

■ Pay structures based on effectiveness and performance pay (In other words, make teachers’ pay dependent on the score from an arcane mathematical algorithm that no one understands (VAM) and which jumps around widely and wildly from year to year for the same teacher; and which correlates with nothing else. BTW, none of the many studies conducted on performance pay has yet shown that ‘performance pay’ for teachers does anything to help students. What’s more, many teachers in jurisdictions that have bonuses for teachers who score high on these formulas refuse to accept the bonuses, because of the ‘poison pills’ attached to the bonuses.)

■ Parental notification and parental consent for student placement with ineffective teachers (in other words, public shaming of teachers who happen to end up on the short end of the VAM yardstick; this is part of Rhee’s Orwellian use of the phrase “Elevate the Teaching Profession”

■ Remove arbitrary caps on public charter establishment and establish alternative authorizing and fast-track process for high-performing public charters (We now know that charter schools are frankly aimed at destroying public education, not improving it. We also know that in 5/6 of the cases, charter schools do the same as OR WORSE THAN their peer public schools. We also know that the few charter schools that have good student achievement records do so by winnowing out all of the problem students — who are sent back to the public schools — and by having longer days, longer years, and summer programs, all of which cost more money.)

■ Provide comparable funding and prohibit authorizers from charging fees from public charter schools for oversight and administration (In other words, make sure that charters get MORE money per pupil than the regular schools, since just about all charter schools receive large private donations. My administrator friends in DCPS and elsewhere tell me that private donors essentially refuse to give anything to regular public schools these days, no matter how worthy the program.)

Now go look at the rankings of the states that do what she suggests.

2 Responses to What is measured in Michelle Rhee’s bogus state report card?

  1. imhotep January 8, 2013 at 6:48 pm #

    “Frontline.” Tonite at 10 PM. “The Education of Michelle Rhee.” Could be interesting.

  2. Ron January 8, 2013 at 6:54 pm #

    See, thing is, hedge fund billionaires don’t give a shit what she says. What they want is the result of what she’s selling; the destruction of public education. An educated, thinking populace is anathema to Oligarchic rule. Our Corporate Masters hated the idea when it was introduced and have been seeking ways to destroy it ever since. One of the most progressive measures to result from the farmer’s revolt of the late 1800’s was the establishment of dozens of ‘agricultural colleges,’ most familiar now as state colleges. Affordable higher education available to pretty much anyone ushered in the rise of the American middle class. The rich abetted by their Rethug surrogates have been attacking public education ever since. They succeeded in destroying affordable higher education and have now focused on making everyone as stupid as their cretinous supporters.

Site Meter