Deep thought
Do primary challenges doom a sitting president — or does a sitting president have to be perceived as so weak before someone will challenge him that he’d lose anyway?
Hmm.
Do primary challenges doom a sitting president — or does a sitting president have to be perceived as so weak before someone will challenge him that he’d lose anyway?
Hmm.
Chris Brown: Bookmark It
Read more →
Stevie Wonder: Bookmark It
Read more →
Tim Minchin’s song that was cut from the Jonathan Ross Show: Bookmark It
Read more →
John McCutcheon: Bookmark It
Read more →At Washington and Passyunk, I spotted what looked like a leftover Halloween scarecrow sitting in a deck chair outside a row house. It was a middle-aged woman, a ringer for Norma Desmond in Sunset Boulevard. More here. Bookmark It
Read more →
Go read, it cracked me up. Bookmark It
Read more →
Whitney Houston: Bookmark It
Read more →
This is a beautiful Austrian carol the choir sang at last year’s Midnight Mass. I can’t believe I never heard of it until now: Still, still, still, one can hear the falling snow. For all is hushed, the world is sleeping. Holy Star, its vigil keeping. Still, still, still, one can hear the falling snow. Sleep, sleep, sleep, ’tis the eve of our Savior’s birth. The night is peaceful all around you, close your eyes, let sleep surround you. Sleep, [...]
Read more →
3:27 pm
it’s hard to say, largely because credible primary challenges to a sitting president are really rare. the last one that happened was ted kennedy vs. carter, right? that was over 30 years ago and while carter later went on to lose, that’s just a single example, not a pattern.
in 1972 nixon faced a primary challenge from john ashbrook and then he later went on to be reelected. because he won in the general, no one remembers that primary challenge hurting him at all. but then ashbrook only got 5% of the vote, so maybe his challenge was “credible” and doesn’t count.
if you go back further than that, you’re talking about a different primary system than the one we have now. actually, the system was different in 1980 and 1972 too, so maybe we have no data at all.
4:04 pm
I’d have to dig around for the literature, but there’s actually been some research in this field. As I understand it, most political science scholars would say B, as long as when you say challenger you’re referring to a credible challenger.
4:48 pm
Shall we try it and see?
4:50 pm
Some people think a massive war chest, the threat of dividing the Democratic party along racial lines, and a GOP primary that will guarantee only the most bonkers candidates, gives ordinary voters no choice in the matter, and impunity from primaries. Those people have also been making a series of enormous, fundamental, and galling political miscalculations that bring the legitimacy of the entire U.S. Government into question.
6:17 pm
I think it’s a great idea to challenge in the primary. It’s time for Obama to answer some fucking hard questions about his abandonment of his campaign promises and enthusiastic adoption of the very things that Americans were voting against when they elected him. No primary challenge and all we’ll get are campaign platitudes.