Coates’ is dead on target as he writes about Obama’s ability to avoid the “black rage” personafication of, say, a Rev. Wright. I commented here recently how Obama must not, and cannot, be seen as an “angry black man”, and that, I believe, this is why he comes off as ultra- concillitory towards the opposition which, for a black man raised in this country, is a learned behavior.
He recently commented in an interview with the Associated Press—-something to the effect that—-if he was re-elected, the Opposition would no longer have reasons to try to oppose him anymore, and that he stood ready to compromise on a whole range of issues if they chose not to obstruct his proposals for the country. If true, I think history will not just record that he was our first black president, but that he was our most naive and aloof one.
Coates’ is dead on target as he writes about Obama’s ability to avoid the “black rage” personafication of, say, a Rev. Wright. I commented here recently how Obama must not, and cannot, be seen as an “angry black man”, and that, I believe, this is why he comes off as ultra- concillitory towards the opposition which, for a black man raised in this country, is a learned behavior.
He recently commented in an interview with the Associated Press—-something to the effect that—-if he was re-elected, the Opposition would no longer have reasons to try to oppose him anymore, and that he stood ready to compromise on a whole range of issues if they chose not to obstruct his proposals for the country. If true, I think history will not just record that he was our first black president, but that he was our most naive and aloof one.
I’m gonna go with the latter.