Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- quixote on Fiscal cliff talks
- quixote on Sedition
- Ron on Ted Westhusing
- lless on Train to nowhere
- imhotep on Fiscal cliff talks
- imhotep on Rick Santorum will gladly work to cut Social Security
- lless on Fiscal cliff talks
- imhotep on Ted Westhusing
- imhotep on Fiscal cliff talks
- jawbone on Fiscal cliff talks
- paul j on Fiscal cliff talks
- jawbone on I heart corporate America
- Major Kong on Love is a battlefield
- Tom on Poor multimillionaire CEO
- JJ on Love is a battlefield
- Riverdaughter on We’re No. 1
- imhotep on Train to nowhere
- imhotep on Poor multimillionaire CEO
- lless on Poor multimillionaire CEO
- wobbly on My life and welcome to it
Blogroll
- Alicublog
- AmericaBlog
- Atrios
- Attytood
- Avedon's Sideshow
- Bartcop
- Blue Jersey
- Chicks Dig The Long Ball
- Corrente
- Crooks and Liars
- Digby
- DiPinto Guitar Blog
- Dirty Hippies
- Dotted Yellow Line
- Failed Empire
- Field Negro
- First Draft
- Food Blogs
- Hecate
- Hyperbole and A Half
- Newshounds
- Odd Man Out
- Open Left
- PowerPop
- Raw Story
- Rick Smith
- Riverdaughter
- Shakesville
- Slacktivist
- Susie Bright
- Talk Left
- The Sideshow
- Wampum
- Washington Monthly
- WXPN livestream







There’s a big blank between the title of the piece and the brief write-up.
Anyone know what’s in that empty space? Ad or video? Or…?
Nothing. Unless you mean “Microsoft patents spying on you with your TV’s camera and fining you if there are too many people watching.”
I am calling this out for bullshit. There is no named person who has had service interrupted. Microsoft is arrogant but not this stupid. I would love a piece of the class action for invasion of privacy on this item. I don’t think most attorneys would believe that a license agreement could cover an invasion this intrusive.
I agree with Iless.
My instant reaction was that this was a joke/hoax.
April fool!
I see yet another way to monetize Microsoft products.
Wait until they can detect exactly who is utilizing their Windows program, and, if it’s not the direct purchaser, then they will begin to charge rent for the time someone else uses it.
Seriously.
You think you OWN your Windows? IIRC, it’s licensed to you. So, why not maximize their profits in any way feasibly legally possible….