The big liberal victory

I wish I could say Glenn Greenwald was wrong, but…

Indeed, Obama already sought in his first term to implement sizable cuts to those programs, but liberals were saved only by GOP recalcitrance to compromise on taxes. In light of their drubbing last night, they are likely to be marginally if not substantially more flexible, which means that such a deal is more possible than ever.

In other words, the political leader in whose triumph liberals are today ecstatically basking is likely to target their most cherished government policies within a matter of weeks, even days. With their newly minted power, will they have any ability, or even will, to stop him? If history is any indication, this is how this “fight” will proceed:

STEP ONE: Liberals will declare that cutting social security and Medicare benefits – including raising the eligibility age or introducing “means-testing” – are absolutely unacceptable, that they will never support any bill that does so no matter what other provisions it contains, that they will wage war on Democrats if they try.

STEP TWO: As the deal gets negotiated and takes shape, progressive pundits in Washington, with Obama officials persuasively whispering in their ear, will begin to argue that the proposed cuts are really not that bad, that they are modest and acceptable, that they are even necessary to save the programs from greater cuts or even dismantlement.

STEP THREE: Many progressives – ones who are not persuaded that these cuts are less than draconian or defensible on the merits – will nonetheless begin to view them with resignation and acquiescence on pragmatic grounds. Obama has no real choice, they will insist, because he must reach a deal with the crazy, evil GOP to save the economy from crippling harm, and the only way he can do so is by agreeing to entitlement cuts. It is a pragmatic necessity, they will insist, and anyone who refuses to support it is being a purist, unreasonably blind to political realities, recklessly willing to blow up Obama’s second term before it even begins.

STEP FOUR: The few liberal holdouts, who continue to vehemently oppose any bill that cuts social security and Medicare, will be isolated and marginalized, excluded from the key meetings where these matters are being negotiated, confined to a few MSNBC appearances where they explain their inconsequential opposition.

STEP FIVE: Once a deal is announced, and everyone from Obama to Harry Reid and the DNC are behind it, any progressives still vocally angry about it and insisting on its defeat will be castigated as ideologues and purists, compared to the Tea Party for their refusal to compromise, and scorned (by compliant progressives) as fringe Far Left malcontents.

STEP SIX: Once the deal is enacted with bipartisan support and Obama signs it in a ceremony, standing in front of his new Treasury Secretary, the supreme corporatist Erskine Bowles, where he touts the virtues of bipartisanship and making “tough choices”, any progressives still complaining will be told that it is time to move on. Any who do not will be constantly reminded that there is an Extremely Important Election coming – the 2014 midterm – where it will be Absolutely Vital that Democrats hold onto the Senate and that they take over the House. Any progressive, still infuriated by cuts to social security and Medicare, who still refuses to get meekly in line behind the Party will be told that they are jeopardizing the Party’s chances for winning that Vital Election and – as a result of their opposition – are helping Mitch McConnell take over control of the Senate and John Boehner retain control of the House.

And so it goes. That is the standard pattern of self-disempowerment used by American liberals to render themselves impotent and powerless in Washington, not just on economic issues but the full panoply of political disputes, from ongoing militarism, military spending and war policies to civil liberties assaults, new cabinet appointments, immigration policy, and virtually everything else likely to arise in the second term.

8 Responses to The big liberal victory

  1. Tracey November 9, 2012 at 11:58 am #

    If it goes down like that AGAIN I will start writing to my reps about IMPEACHMENT!

  2. Pragmatic Realist November 9, 2012 at 12:18 pm #

    It will be the same scenario as the health-care, health insurance “reform”. Same game, same players. Months of drama with Obama never saying out loud publicly what he will do. Many liberal columns, leaks, and finally he gives in to accept everything the other side demands.

  3. Jay November 9, 2012 at 1:23 pm #

    You forgot to mention the part where GOP runs against the Democrats in 2014 for cutting Social Security and Medicare.

  4. lless November 9, 2012 at 1:37 pm #

    Yes Jay, but you forget that in 2014 it will be true!

  5. mjames November 9, 2012 at 2:06 pm #

    I don’t think he’s necessarily giving in. He doesn’t seem to have core principles, so there’s no giving in there. And he so badly wants Jamie Dimon’s approval that perhaps he truly wants to strip us bare.

  6. jawbone November 9, 2012 at 2:25 pm #

    How much did the Compromise-in-Chief compromise in today’s speech?

    He has begun his great, inexorable march to the right, the better to best St. Ronnie at his own Republican game.

    I do not trust Obama. He now can claim a mandate, but he will ignore his voters to enact his own goals. Oh, helppppppp!!!!!!!

  7. jawbone November 9, 2012 at 2:25 pm #

    Is destroying the Dem Party one of Obama’s goals?

  8. jawbone November 9, 2012 at 2:26 pm #

    Of course, a leveraged buyout will destroy is just as effectively. And Wall Street bought its president in ’08…. Now, maybe he can get after those pesky New Deal great social programs.

Site Meter