Binders full of lies

The topic of Paul Krugman’s Friday column was Mitt Romney’s failure to propose a credible jobs plan to bring down the unemployment rate. The upshot of it was that Romney is far less serious about creating jobs than Barack Obama, who, as we know, has not exactly attacked the unemployment problem with the fervor of an FDR.

I’m buying much of Krugman’s argument, including his point that Congressional Republicans, from the get-go, did their best to block any effort to pass legislation that might have reflected well on Obama.

But the main reason to vote for Obama is that he’s not Romney. It’s Romney’s phenomenal propensity for lying about matters large and small. It’s the Ted Bundy-esque gap between the facts of his life and how he describes his life to the rest of us.

More here.

Virtually Speaking Sunday

6pm pacific | 9pm eastern
Listen Live and Later: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/virtuallyspeaking/2012/10/22/marcy-wheeler-and-stuart-zechman-virtually-speaking-sundays

Marcy Wheeler, one of America’s great investigative journalists joins Stuart Zechman to discuss political and policy developments of the week Follow @stuart_zechman @emptywheel

Also featuring Culture of Truth’s identification of the Most Ridiculous Thing That Happened This Sunday on the Sunday morning gasbag programs.

Links

http://www.emptywheel.net/

Does the Romney family own your voting machine?

Very possible.

Will you cast your vote this fall on a faulty electronic machine that’s partly owned by the Romney Family? Will that machine decide whether Romney will then inherit the White House?


Through a closely held equity fund called Solamere, Mitt Romney and his wife, son and brother are major investors in an investment firm called H.I.G. Capital. H.I.G. in turn holds a majority share and three out of five board members in Hart Intercivic, a company that owns the notoriously faulty electronic voting machines that will count the ballots in swing state Ohio November 7. Hart machines will also be used elsewhere in the United States.


In other words, a candidate for the presidency of the United States, and his brother, wife and son, have a straight-line financial interest in the voting machines that could decide this fall’s election. These machines cannot be monitored by the public. But they will help decide who “owns” the White House.

Site Meter