4 thoughts on “NYT endorses imaginary Trans Pacific Partnership”
“…limit the ability of governments to tilt the playing field in favor of state-owned firms…”
How antiquated and misleading.
These days, it’s the firms that own the state.
Because it’s such a good deal, we need to fast track it so that it doesn’t wilt when exposed to sunlight.
“…so that it doesn’t wilt when exposed to sunlight…”
Oh. Guess that explains why the lead TPP negotiator is Vlad Dracul.
Now that a real example of one-world rule, by corporate elites in this scenario, has come along. Foretelling the real loss of our Freeeeedom and Sovereignty! I’m waiting for the outragegasm to go off the charts. Where’s Beck, where’s O’Really, where for dog’s sake is the Kock Brothers money machine cranking out indignation?
“…limit the ability of governments to tilt the playing field in favor of state-owned firms…”
How antiquated and misleading.
These days, it’s the firms that own the state.
Because it’s such a good deal, we need to fast track it so that it doesn’t wilt when exposed to sunlight.
“…so that it doesn’t wilt when exposed to sunlight…”
Oh. Guess that explains why the lead TPP negotiator is Vlad Dracul.
Now that a real example of one-world rule, by corporate elites in this scenario, has come along. Foretelling the real loss of our Freeeeedom and Sovereignty! I’m waiting for the outragegasm to go off the charts. Where’s Beck, where’s O’Really, where for dog’s sake is the Kock Brothers money machine cranking out indignation?