
It really is weird, to see an organization that considers itself “the paper of record,” diving into the same groundless scandalmongering they did when Bill Clinton was president. It all seems very class-based.

It really is weird, to see an organization that considers itself “the paper of record,” diving into the same groundless scandalmongering they did when Bill Clinton was president. It all seems very class-based.
Comments are closed.
If you have any pull with the liberal blogosphere, you should coordinate a “NY Times shits the Clinton sheets”-watch, sort of a bullshit bingo/drinking game. Then heap scorn on subsequent news outlets that “fell for the NY Times’ bullshit.” You could call it “Chump’d.” Keep a running score of “greatest hits” after each eruption. After a campaign like that for a while you can write stories about their “mounting credibility problems” about how their pathological self-immolating hatred makes them get everything wrong about the Clintons. I mean, the MO is pretty well-established and this is getting a bit old.
It is getting very very very very very old. And why? What for? Who would they rather have as a candidate? Bloomberg?
Sheesh.
I like the bingo card idea! Although it might take less than a day to fill the card up.
That’s a pretty violent image, too. Classy as ever. One can only hope they lose a lot of their readership and go the way of the dinosaur like most newspapers are doing.