Privacy wins in federal appeals court

5 Steps to Computer Forensic Investigation

This was good news:

In a victory for privacy rights at the border, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit today ruled that forensic searches of electronic devices carried out by border agents without any suspicion that the traveler has committed a crime violate the U.S. Constitution.

The ruling in U.S. v. Kolsuz is the first federal appellate case after the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Riley v. California (2014) to hold that certain border device searches require individualized suspicion that the traveler is involved in criminal wrongdoing. Two other federal appellate opinions this year—from the Fifth Circuit and Eleventh Circuit—included strong analyses by judges who similarly questioned suspicionless border device searches.

EFF filed an amicus brief in Kolsuz arguing that the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley supports the conclusion that border agents need a probable cause warrant before searching electronic devices—whether manually or with forensic software—because of the unprecedented and significant privacy interests travelers have in their digital data. In Riley, a case that involved manual searches, the Supreme Court followed similar reasoning and held that police must obtain a warrant to search the cell phone of an arrestee.

One thought on “Privacy wins in federal appeals court

  1. 13 Russian nationals were indicted by Mueller in the Russia/Trump probe.

    Several of them have retained an American lawyer who filed discovery documents, on their behalf, with the court the other day.

    The defendants are demanding that the US government turn over all documents dating back to 1950 that relate to American law enforcement agencies spying on and wire tapping foreign nationals residing within the US.

    Hmmmmmm………Hopefully the government won’t offer up privacy concerns to refuse the defendents request.
    Wouldn’t we all like to see those documents?

Comments are closed.