Wingnut logic

Rand Paul

No birth control, no abortion — and no welfare if you get pregnant one too many times. Yeah, that makes sense!

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) suggested the possibility of cutting government benefits for unwed mothers who have multiple children.

“Maybe we have to say ‘enough’s enough, you shouldn’t be having kids after a certain amount,’” said Paul, who opposes legal abortion and has criticized the federal health care law’s contraception mandate as a violation of religious and economic liberty.

The likely 2016 presidential candidate made the remarks during a luncheon in Lexington, reported the Lexington Herald-Leader, in response to a question about workforce development.

The conservative senator said communities or families should be responsible for the prevention of unplanned or unwanted pregnancy, but he said government policies could discourage unwed mothers from having additional children. “Married with kids versus unmarried with kids is the difference between living in poverty and not,” Paul said.

2 thoughts on “Wingnut logic

  1. Senator “Ayn” Rand Paul sounds like every other Libertarian. Foolish. So let’s talk about Planet Hillary. A world populated by investment bankers, venture capitalists, hucksters, charlatans, liars and weak-minded sycophants lacking critical thinking skills. That’s not a negative of course because the 1% has already anoited her and will hold her coronation on January 20th, 2017. In a real democracy “we the people” would have the power to reject the preordained plans of the 1%. But, alas…………

  2. Going back to St. Augustine, sex is sin. Children are God’s punishment for sex. Anything people use to avoid this punishment is immoral. It is quite simple really.

Comments are closed.