Blind spots

evil hillary

When they used to give me personality tests for sales jobs, one of the weird things I learned is that I have really high sales resistance. This is odd, because sales people in general are the most susceptible to a sales pitch, and some employers expressed concern that I was lacking this trait. But they hired me anyway, and it all worked out.

Maybe it’s the ADD. Maybe I’m not really paying attention, or maybe I just have a more accurate bullshit detector. (Except with men, but that’s another story.) I’m not a joiner, and I’m not much of a true believer. A mutant, I guess. What I do hate, however, is bullshit. One of my friends said to me, “You’re such a Hillary fan, you’re always defending her!” and I got really mad. “No, I’m defending the fucking truth,” I said. “If you want to go after her on policy, fine. But not this media-driven personality bullshit, or these fake scandals.”

I can’t say it any plainer: The media is our enemy.

I know you think you know all about Hillary Clinton, because the media’s been attacking her for a couple of decades now. (And if Bernie Sanders starts looking like a real threat, just watch what they do to him.) Don’t underestimate the power of all the loaded language the media has been feeding us for so long; it’s subliminal. They’ve convinced us she’s a monster. She’s not.

People tell me, “I don’t have to pay attention to the media to know that Hillary Clinton is (fill in the blank).” But here’s the thing: Where do these ideas come from? Your opinions about her had to come from somewhere, right? Do you actually know Hillary Clinton? (I don’t know her, although I know some people who do.) In America, we think we know the people on our teevee. (I was always fascinated to read interviews with actors who played soap opera villains, because they describe how people come up to them on the street, yelling at them and even hitting them.)

I can’t find the link now, but there was a story a few weeks ago about an expansive Republican program to tear down Clinton on social media (especially Facebook) by feeding an endless stream of negative stories into the newsfeeds. The reason I don’t write about all of this is, there aren’t enough hours in the day! The stories are very cleverly selected, because they’re so nuanced, you’d have to be a political junkie like me to know how misleading they are, or all the background material that rebuts them. And your eyes would glaze over if I tried to explain them, anyway.

And frankly, I’m tired of it. I go onto Facebook for the jokes and kitten pictures, not more work.

I hope I have enough credibility with readers that you understand if there’s a real scandal, I’ll let you know.

TV Hillary is not Real Hillary. The media is not your friend. Pay attention. Build up your sales resistance.

I don’t care who you vote for in the primary. But if Hillary Clinton ends up as the candidate, it would be really helpful if you didn’t pass along Republican smears.

Clinton addresses TPP in Iowa

June 13, 2015 - Official campaign launch in New York, NY

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton talked about the divisive Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal Sunday, following earlier criticism from rival Bernie Sanders concerning her lack of a stance on the deal. While Clinton didn’t necessarily take a strong stance, it was a shift away from her previous position of not addressing the deal until negotiations are completed.… Continue reading “Clinton addresses TPP in Iowa”

Covering Bernie Sanders

This is a problem. They aren’t getting much press coverage, and if they’re not getting press coverage, what do I link to? Also, photos. I contacted someone at the campaign asking that they dump some pictures into Flickr, and was told to get them from Google.

This wasn’t that helpful, because most big sites now use the Flickr app that searches for content licensed for public use. So yeah, I can search Google instead and find some licensed photos — but it takes about three times as long. With the app, I simply search for the photo and click a button. Much easier, much faster. (As you know, I’m working several jobs.)

Anyway, if I don’t have as many Sanders stories as I do Clinton stories, it’s because 1) mainstream media is treating him as a joke and they’re not doing their job and 2) his campaign is not making it easy. (However, I do find a lot of videos.)

If you see a good Sanders story, by all means, send it to me or leave it in the contents.

Social cleansing

First eary light in paradise - Punta Cana, Dominican Requblic
Just unthinkable. The Dominican Republican has decided to get rid of as many people of Haitian descent as they can:

In two days about a quarter of a million people will be made stateless. They will have no homes, no passports, and no civil rights. There are several reasons for this, but the primary reason is racism.

At issue is a ruling by the Constitutional Court in the Dominican Republic to strip away the citizenship of several generations of Dominicans.

According to the decision, Dominicans born after 1929 to parents who are not of Dominican ancestry are to have their citizenship revoked. The ruling affects an estimated 250,000 Dominican people of Haitian descent, including many who have had no personal connection with Haiti for several generations.

What we are witnessing is one of the largest humanitarian crisis in the western hemisphere, except this one is completely by choice.,/blockquote>

What happens now with the TPP

credo-tpp-rally-6.19-3

David Dayen at Salon:

Here are the options now in the House:

  • Pass TAA on a re-vote. Speaker John Boehner set this up for a vote next week, where they will try to persuade more Democrats and Republicans. Republican support topped out at 93 (votes started moving away from TAA once it was clear it wouldn’t pass), meaning that 124 Democrats would need to give their support. That’s a very tall order, especially now that it’s clearly the only thing standing between the President and his trade authority. Democratic groups, which demanded a no vote on TAA, will surely continue to whip the vote on their side.
  • Pass a separate standalone fast track bill. Just the threat of this, leaving Democrats with the President’s trade authority in place and no TAA, might be enough to get TAA passed. But it shouldn’t be. Just because 219 members voted for fast track on a meaningless vote today doesn’t mean they would be there on a standalone vote. Also, there is no way the Senate would concur on a fast-track trade bill without TAA: that would lose too many Democratic votes to pass. So this seems like an idle threat. Mitch McConnell could pass fast track with a promise to pass TAA later, but he’s already done that gambit once, getting fast track forward with a promise of a vote on reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank. That promise has been broken, and there’s no reason for Senators to believe McConnell again.
  • Make changes to TAA or fast track to get enough Democrats on board: This is what Pelosi was intimating, but it’s hard to see how that could plausibly occur. They would have to get any changes agreed to by the House and the Senate, which opens the process up to a lot of messiness. And even if all the issues with TAA were dispensed with – no paying for the assistance with Medicare cuts, no exemptions for public employees, etc. – the bill has now become the impediment to more corporate-written trade deals that set regulatory caps and facilitate job loss, and liberal Democrats know it. As Rep. Keith Ellison, co-chair of the Progressive Caucus, told the Huffington Post, “You can’t take the politics out of politics.”
  • Give Democrats something they want: Nancy Pelosi’s Dear Colleague letter makes this clear: “The prospects for passage (of fast track) will greatly increase with the passage of a robust highway bill.” This means that, if Republicans vote for more infrastructure spending, Pelosi would be likely to supply the votes for trade. But it’s not clear whether this is coming from Pelosi only, or if it would have buy-in from her caucus. She might be making a deal her caucus hasn’t empowered her to make. Plus, that would involve Republicans in the House and Senate agreeing to fund more infrastructure, and nobody knows where the money would come from.

It’s entirely possible that one of these scenarios could play out for Republican leaders and the White House, but there are plenty of hurdles involved. And each day that fast track doesn’t pass moves the eventual vote on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the really tough vote, further into the Presidential election cycle. Once fast track passes, negotiators must finalize that deal with 12 nations, then sign it, then start the 90-day legislative clock before it gets a final vote in Congress. That puts us deep into the winter and maybe right around the Iowa caucuses.

Trent Lott used to say that you can’t pass trade deals in even-numbered years, when the public actually might be paying attention. That’s what is likely to happen with more delays. So the clock is the ally of those who oppose the trade deals, and the more they draw it out, the more difficult the climb becomes.

While this is definitely not over, if Democrats do hang tough and kill the President’s trade agenda by not playing along on TAA, it will be a victory for good government. This insanity of getting to pass the parts of a bill you like and having them smushed together Frankenstein-monster style makes it impossible to hold anyone responsible for the ultimate outcome. Democrats should be proud of opting out of that charade.

Persuasion

Blind romance, there’ll be no half measures given half a chance
But we never learn, trusting in the fire while the cruel flame burns
And we need to rebuild what was never there
What got left behind

After all the foolish things that we’ve been through
I could always make a start on something new
And I’ll always be a man who’s open to
Persuasion.

I first heard this at a pivotal moment, I let it change my mind. Richard and Teddy Thompson: