Interesting
May 19th, 2008 at 7:33 am by Susie
People are beginning to catch on to the media game, looks like:
Fully 72% of the public - including comparable percentages of Democrats, Republicans and independents - say that journalists should not be anointing Obama as the Democratic nominee at this stage in the race. Just 20% say that journalists should be doing this.




got it…
saying “hillary clinton will win the primary in west virginia by a large margin” BEFORE it happens is okay.
saying “barack obama will win the nomination based on the agreed upon metrics of the DNC” is NOT okay.
both are true, but one is sexist, the other is fine analysis.
time for…
MORNING LATTE!
Morning, Steve! I see you have the early shift. Hope you got to be one of the 400 bloggers Obama is paying.
is the results that interesting? i mean, the results were practically inevitable when the question is asked like that. i betcha over 70% of the public would tell pollsters that any profession should not be “annointing” anyone anything.
as for sisters of ye, it is sad to watch the clintonosphere taking rightwing smears (originating from a fox news crawl of all places!) as fact, without even the slightest efforts to examine whether someone pulled these “facts” out their ass. the “400 bloggers” seems to be completely made up, just like that mythical michelle obama videotape.
reality sux…
Link
tiresome.
Speaking of media, perhaps you’ll post this little tidbit Obama eyes media with promise of antitrust push.