The obvious solution

by Susie
To all this nonsense is for women to stop having sex… with men:

The Republican-controlled US House of Represenatatives is considering legislation that would enact stringent new limitations on minors who seek an abortion outside of their home state. The “Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act” effectively federalizes state laws aimed at preventing women under the age of 18 from obtaining an abortion, and would impose harsh penalties on doctors or anyone else who assists the minor without first informering her parent or guardian.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) introduced the bill in June 2011. The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the measure on Thursday, a signal that it may advance in the near future. The bill requires a minor’s parent or guardian to be notified in writing and a 24-hour waiting period after that notification before the young woman can obtain the abortion.

Doctors or anyone who assists the minor without first informing her parents may be fined up to $100,000 and imprisoned for up to a year for violating this law. Thirty-seven states currently require parental involvement of some type, if a minor seeks an abortion, the law is meant to prevent anyone from traveling to another state to avoid those laws. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio (R) introduced the Senate version of the bill last June as well, declaring that it was an effort to ensure state parental laws are not “undermined and circumvented.”

While the sponsors insist that the law would not apply in cases of “medical emergency, abuse or neglect,” it would put the burden on the young woman to prove that she is, in fact, a victim of one of those circumstances. The Center for Reproductive Rights contends that the law would subject the young women, their doctors, and anyone who might help them to a “confusing maze of overlapping and conflicting state and federal laws—making it more difficult and more dangerous for young women to obtain abortions.”

The bill, CRR maintains, “fails to consider the reasons why a teen would turn to another adult like her grandmother or aunt for support, and could force young women to instead rely on an abusive caretaker, choose to travel alone or turn to unsafe alternatives to terminating her pregnancy.”

Nope, no problem there! No young woman could possibly have a valid reason for seeking an abortion on her own (like, for instance, the not-that-rare circumstance where her father is the person who impregnanted her). Nope, none at all

4 Responses to The obvious solution

  1. Adams March 13, 2012 at 3:20 pm #

    Oh, well. So much for the “this is a state by state issue” defense of rollback of women’s health care. Oh, wait, I forgot that the IOKIYAR standard specifies that:

    1. Ideology pre-empts consistency.
    2. But not always because: see #1

  2. lea-p March 13, 2012 at 4:21 pm #

    Yah, I guess this War on Women is kind of like the Peloponnesian War, except the former has been going on for far longer (umpteen trillion years) than the latter (≈27 years?).

  3. NormanLake March 14, 2012 at 11:56 am #

    Where, oh where is the medical profession on these ‘health’ issues? Are they silent because money is there to be made with all the unnecessary procedures dictated by mostly GOP panderers, or do they simply agree with the policies? SILENCE, mostly from them, and I find it disturbing.

  4. Izquierdo March 14, 2012 at 12:38 pm #

    Good point, Norman.
    MDs are usually bright and well-educated people.
    They already make shitloads of money in most cases.
    Maybe they fear some type of retaliation.
    After all it’s just a small step from killing abortion
    providers to killing contraception providers.

Site Meter