Apparently we unemployed bums are being far too meek for our elected representatives to hear us.
10 thoughts on “Tier 5”
Comments are closed.
Apparently we unemployed bums are being far too meek for our elected representatives to hear us.
Comments are closed.
It seems that my onslaught of emails to my Reps haven’t been enough.
Barbara Lee, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi – be forewarned. Many more emails will be coming your way.
Barbara Lee – Oakland’s unemployment stands at 18%. You should be ashamed in not addressing that!
All of you, Lee, Boxer, Feinstein, Pelosi – work for us!!!
I know they, especially Boxer and Feinstein, who represent many millions of people vs. thousands represented by Max Baucus.
But sheesh, have the ovaries to speak out and be counted, for crying out loud!!
I’ve seen CRICKETS coming from the California side on jobs and unemployment!!
Send a REAL letter. You know, handwritten. It has a lot more impact.
Sorry – I didn’t finish the sentence…:
I know they, especially Boxer and Feinstein, who represent many millions of people (vs. thousands represented by Max Baucus. Coward and a*hole as he is) and I know you’re busy beyond belief.
YOU though, must know more than any how unemployment effects the people in your state. Well over 12%, in fact, it went UP in the last quarter. And that doesn’t even count the people who are either not eligible or have given up.
Once this last extension expires for me, I’ll be one ‘counted as having given up’ apparently, eventhough I haven’t.
Ugh – I get so mad at them!!
Susie – do you think it does? If so, I will indeed do so.
One of my hang-ups is that, say Max Baucus, that he represents less than a million people. The TOTAL population of his state is less than a million.
Then look at say California or New York. 36 million and 19 million respectively.
They all get two Senators – one Senator represents about 400K people, one Senator represents about 18 MILLION people.
How’s that a ‘fair’ democracy????
However much I pounce on the representatives of my state, how is it fair, really, since they have appr. 9 MILLION residents to deal with, each.
Vs. Max Baucus who probably knows everyone in his state by name!
That whole Senate system is so so wrong!!
Actually, I’ll write my letters tonight.
I will attach my resume to each and every one of those letters.
Thanks – hang in.
Are your ads bringing in at least some money??? I try and click your site as much as I can!!
One question left though. Perhaps for history buffs, perhaps every US Citizen knows this:
When did this whole ‘2 Senators per State’ thing get invented/implemented?
If it was 1790 – then just look at this chart:
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004986.html
Seeing the Forest has an article on this as well.
Word of the year is “plutonomy.”
Jawbone – yes and no.
I was talking about the ‘system as invented by the founders’, meaning Democracy. The way they designed the system was based on their current situation/state-hoods/population.
That needs to be changed.
I’m hoping/thinking if THAT’s changed, people have a true voice yet again.
I’m thinking to change the Senate to how the House is arranged. Number of people per x-area.
Yes, the ultra rich and ultra powerful will fight that to their deaths – the current set-up works really REALLY well for them.
The thing they fear the most is PEOPLE. People, popular vote. Yes, that’s why they’re orchestrating this ‘Tea-Party’ business right now.
I know all that.
I just don’t know what to do about it.
French Revolution? Guillotines?? Tempting….
Dutch — It was the Great Compromise at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Equal representation was established for the Senate and proportional representation for the House.
See here for more info:
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/greatcomp.htm
http://www.answers.com/topic/connecticut-compromise
http://www.mrnussbaum.com/history/conc.htm
“The thing they fear the most is PEOPLE. People, popular vote. Yes, that’s why they’re orchestrating this ‘Tea-Party’ business right now.”
A system of a straight popular vote would give the most populous states a disproportionate influence.
What exactly makes you think that some other form of government would work less well for the rich? What we really need, what has always been required for effective government is an informed and politically active populace. If more people actually paid attention to the issues and voted, our government would be more responsive.
“Convinced that the people are the only safe depositories of their own liberty, and that they are not safe unless enlightened to a certain degree, I have looked on our present state of liberty as a short-lived possession unless the mass of the people could be informed to a certain degree.” –Thomas Jefferson to Littleton Waller Tazewell, 1805.