Voter ID hearing again

The PA Supreme Court kicked the actual decision back to the lower court, but they also ordered the judge to block the law unless he finds voters aren’t going to be disenfranchised. Today, that case will be made before the Commonwealth Court:

The state of Pennsylvania’s ability to get every would-be voter a government-issued photo ID by Election Day will literally be on trial Tuesday.

The hearing before Commonwealth Judge Robert Simpson comes after the state Supreme Court last week instructed him to block a new law requiring ID at the polls unless he determines “that there will be no voter disenfranchisement” arising from its implementation.

Opponents of the law have said the state can’t possibly prove that case, as the law’s entire reason for existence is precisely to make it harder for the poor, members of minority groups, students, and the elderly to cast their ballots, and in that way suppress the Democratic vote.

Republican backers of the law have said it was intended to fight voter fraud. But in-person voter fraud — the only kind voter ID would reduce — is almost nonexistent.

Back in August, Simpson upheld the law — one of the strictest among similar bills recently passed by GOP legislatures around the country — ruling that it wasn’t unconstitutional in theory.

But now the question is one of implementation, and whether the state is fulfilling its promise to educate voters about what they’ll need at the polls this year and get them the IDs they need if they don’t have them. Signs are that it isn’t.

The main provider of photo IDs is the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation — PennDOT. PennDOT has only issued a fraction of the IDs estimated to be necessary.

News articles abound about how hard it’s been for would-be voters who lack ID — say, a 91-year-old World War II veteran or a Philadelphia homeowner who rides the bus — to deal with PennDOT.

It also turns out the state is actually blocking attempts by various Democratic officials who have come up with ways to get IDs to those who need them more effectively.

State Sen. Wayne Fontana, a Democrat who represents the Pittsburgh area, recently took to his local website to complain that top Pennsylvania officials denied his request to create neighborhood centers by using state offices — including legislators’ district offices — to distribute photo ID.

One thought on “Voter ID hearing again

  1. This will prove to be another stab at Bush v Gore clock running. Look for the trial court to find a deficiency of proof and then count on the re-appeal to run out the clock.

Comments are closed.